Since the leading cause of death in Alberta is "Unknown", ahead of heart attacks, strokes, etc (the usual causes) I want to know why AHS is not investigating these deaths. IT'S THEIR JOB!
My confidence in that organization is now zero. Management all needs to be fired.
Sheldon you are a Canadian Hero.... you are doing the work that our disgusting, corrupt Public Health and Medical system is obfuscating. WTF!!! Crickets from regulatory bodies....totally captured and complicit in this democide.
here’s a link listing the adverse events to be reported, see page 8. this is from the CDC. the document also references a Canadian study of the post-vax carditises... something to deep dive into)
“Reporting Adverse Event or Medication Errors
The vaccination provider is responsible for mandatory reporting of the following to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS):
• vaccine administration errors whether or not associated with an adverse event,
• serious adverse events (irrespective of attribution to vaccination),
• cases of myocarditis
• cases of pericarditis
• cases of Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome (MIS) in adults and children, and
• cases of COVID-19 that result in hospitalization or death.”
(noteworthy: according to the CDC THE VACCINE PROVIDER IS RESPONSIBLE... not doctors. doubt many pharmacists are doing any follow-up or reporting...
CASES OF COVID-19 THAT RESULT IN HOSPITALIZATION OR DEATH is an adverse event to be reported by the vaccine provider.
i was looking for the instructions to those administering the vaccines, it says that the person injecting must report adverse events INCLUDING cases of covid-19 following vaccination... obviously this has not been done.
but this product monograph is interesting, among other things:
p1. indications: prevention of covid-19
p30. what it tells us about possible reactions: cardio. fertility. that safety for pregnant women NOT ESTABLISHED (last i checked there was massive peer pressure to inject this shit into every pregnant woman ‘safe and effective and the best way to protect your baby’... bullshit... ok. back to the list).for breastfeeding: unknown.
p.32. the studies only had 6 months follow up?
p53. postmarketing reactions: drug interactions unknown (REALLY? wtf?)
p.77 carcinogenicity not assessed. genotoxicity not assessed. reproductive toxicity assessed in rats.
and the main issue i have is that it’s ONLY indicated for the PREVENTION of covid-19.
the stats on covid cases following vaccination show that it has failed to do the only thing it’s indicated for.
Canadian adverse event reporting is about as high quality as Canadian vaccine injury compensation. It is not the worst in the Western world, perhaps. Very far from the best. Alberta may be one of the stronger provinces for data sharing regarding covid and vaccines, that said. I am still hoping they will explain why they removed the amazing graph that showed a huge surge of covid admissions and deaths during the week immediately after vaccination.
What's actually infuriating is that nobody seems to be seeing any of this...and instead, continue to drink the koolaid, nod their head knowingly, with a smile...
"Health practitioners are to report an adverse event following immunization to AHS within 3 days of determining or being informed that a patient has experienced an adverse event following immunization unless it has already been reported." So if it took 6 days to attain bloodwork resulted as in your example, wouldn't that just be part of determining the condition and the three days to report would start at that time? And where does it indicate that a report filed late will be rejected? I'm not saying that this isn't the case, just that a requirement to do something within a specified period of time doesn't necessarily translate to a rejection of the file if it's late unless that's specified explicitly. I don't trust these people and I give a great deal of plausibility to your claims but I don't see things as they're worded as a smoking gun. I appreciate your work greatly and have been reading most of it for many months.
Excellent point my friend...when does the reporting period begin?
Is it on the primary visit? Receipt of testing? Visit with the patient?
Really it's not terribly clear...but I think when taken into consideration with the latency of onset following jabs and the fact that with the 11.5% population of Canada Status making up only 2.16% of all AEFIs, there is a combination of things going on here that don't allow for an effective metrics for any experimental medical procedure, treatment, prescription or vaccination.
I do appreciate you not being fully on board with my train of thought and encourage you to challenge anything I state. I have absolutely no problem in being wrong and called out for it...in fact, I wish people would do it more...I really don't like a lot of what I talk about either.
I'm glad you welcome the feedback, at the very least I hope to be thought provoking. You're right to compare the 2.16% AEFI to the 11.5% population and that margin is too wide to account for factors such as Albertans being more unaffected/ tough/resilient/irresponsible/clueless/etc. than other Canadians and therefore making fewer reports. Any idea what the underreporting factor is for the national data for AEFIs? I'm familiar with the estimates of anywhere between 10 and 100 with the American data in VAERS, but I haven't come across numbers for Canada. From what you've shown, it's 5x worse in Alberta.
I also don't trust them and I'm sure they have plenty of ways so that the claims are not accepted at the end, but this was my question too (3 days from "determining" not from jab?)
The govt is now openly trying to poison you; they aren't even bothering to manipulate the data; they hide it or don't collect it. Won't even mention the "justice" system.
I don't know what more citizens/normies need to accept collapse. Perhaps it's too much, and the fairy tale "Canada" is an easier dream to live inside to avoid taking action.
History would suggest that because Canadians rolled over so easily, they'll do it again. But of course that can't happen here. We're special.
Since the leading cause of death in Alberta is "Unknown", ahead of heart attacks, strokes, etc (the usual causes) I want to know why AHS is not investigating these deaths. IT'S THEIR JOB!
My confidence in that organization is now zero. Management all needs to be fired.
I've been at the same place with AHS for over a decade.
House cleaning is in order and has been for a really long time.
Sheldon you are a Canadian Hero.... you are doing the work that our disgusting, corrupt Public Health and Medical system is obfuscating. WTF!!! Crickets from regulatory bodies....totally captured and complicit in this democide.
More offensive then them hiding information, is the information that they show that nobody seems to understand and how actually terrible it really is.
here’s a link listing the adverse events to be reported, see page 8. this is from the CDC. the document also references a Canadian study of the post-vax carditises... something to deep dive into)
“Reporting Adverse Event or Medication Errors
The vaccination provider is responsible for mandatory reporting of the following to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS):
• vaccine administration errors whether or not associated with an adverse event,
• serious adverse events (irrespective of attribution to vaccination),
• cases of myocarditis
• cases of pericarditis
• cases of Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome (MIS) in adults and children, and
• cases of COVID-19 that result in hospitalization or death.”
(noteworthy: according to the CDC THE VACCINE PROVIDER IS RESPONSIBLE... not doctors. doubt many pharmacists are doing any follow-up or reporting...
CASES OF COVID-19 THAT RESULT IN HOSPITALIZATION OR DEATH is an adverse event to be reported by the vaccine provider.
https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/covid-19/eui/downloads/pfizer-HCP.pdf
this is the Pfizer one, but they’re all similar.
https://covid-vaccine.canada.ca/info/pdf/pfizer-biontech-covid-19-vaccine-pm1-en.pdf
i was looking for the instructions to those administering the vaccines, it says that the person injecting must report adverse events INCLUDING cases of covid-19 following vaccination... obviously this has not been done.
but this product monograph is interesting, among other things:
p1. indications: prevention of covid-19
p30. what it tells us about possible reactions: cardio. fertility. that safety for pregnant women NOT ESTABLISHED (last i checked there was massive peer pressure to inject this shit into every pregnant woman ‘safe and effective and the best way to protect your baby’... bullshit... ok. back to the list).for breastfeeding: unknown.
p.32. the studies only had 6 months follow up?
p53. postmarketing reactions: drug interactions unknown (REALLY? wtf?)
p.77 carcinogenicity not assessed. genotoxicity not assessed. reproductive toxicity assessed in rats.
and the main issue i have is that it’s ONLY indicated for the PREVENTION of covid-19.
the stats on covid cases following vaccination show that it has failed to do the only thing it’s indicated for.
Canadian adverse event reporting is about as high quality as Canadian vaccine injury compensation. It is not the worst in the Western world, perhaps. Very far from the best. Alberta may be one of the stronger provinces for data sharing regarding covid and vaccines, that said. I am still hoping they will explain why they removed the amazing graph that showed a huge surge of covid admissions and deaths during the week immediately after vaccination.
The transparency of the graphs overlaid - vaccinations/hospitalizations - continuously proved that each vaccine cycle drove waves of cases...
https://sheldonyakiwchuk.substack.com/p/boosters-criminally-negligent-homicide
It was open homicide...and that's why they removed it.
I have an idea of what this looks like now...but really don't even want to think about it...especially if I am right.
Because They "KNOWINGLY" Participated In Democide!
It is all SO INFURIATING Grrrr....
What's actually infuriating is that nobody seems to be seeing any of this...and instead, continue to drink the koolaid, nod their head knowingly, with a smile...
You Cannot See Their Smile Behind Their Masks!
Is The Legislature The Appropriate Venue For Tribunals & Executions?
We'll Invite Verna Yiu Back For The Festivities!
‘Unknown Cause of Vaccine’
Brand and Signal Jam, accordingly.
Great read!!
"Health practitioners are to report an adverse event following immunization to AHS within 3 days of determining or being informed that a patient has experienced an adverse event following immunization unless it has already been reported." So if it took 6 days to attain bloodwork resulted as in your example, wouldn't that just be part of determining the condition and the three days to report would start at that time? And where does it indicate that a report filed late will be rejected? I'm not saying that this isn't the case, just that a requirement to do something within a specified period of time doesn't necessarily translate to a rejection of the file if it's late unless that's specified explicitly. I don't trust these people and I give a great deal of plausibility to your claims but I don't see things as they're worded as a smoking gun. I appreciate your work greatly and have been reading most of it for many months.
Excellent point my friend...when does the reporting period begin?
Is it on the primary visit? Receipt of testing? Visit with the patient?
Really it's not terribly clear...but I think when taken into consideration with the latency of onset following jabs and the fact that with the 11.5% population of Canada Status making up only 2.16% of all AEFIs, there is a combination of things going on here that don't allow for an effective metrics for any experimental medical procedure, treatment, prescription or vaccination.
I do appreciate you not being fully on board with my train of thought and encourage you to challenge anything I state. I have absolutely no problem in being wrong and called out for it...in fact, I wish people would do it more...I really don't like a lot of what I talk about either.
I'm glad you welcome the feedback, at the very least I hope to be thought provoking. You're right to compare the 2.16% AEFI to the 11.5% population and that margin is too wide to account for factors such as Albertans being more unaffected/ tough/resilient/irresponsible/clueless/etc. than other Canadians and therefore making fewer reports. Any idea what the underreporting factor is for the national data for AEFIs? I'm familiar with the estimates of anywhere between 10 and 100 with the American data in VAERS, but I haven't come across numbers for Canada. From what you've shown, it's 5x worse in Alberta.
I also don't trust them and I'm sure they have plenty of ways so that the claims are not accepted at the end, but this was my question too (3 days from "determining" not from jab?)
The govt is now openly trying to poison you; they aren't even bothering to manipulate the data; they hide it or don't collect it. Won't even mention the "justice" system.
I don't know what more citizens/normies need to accept collapse. Perhaps it's too much, and the fairy tale "Canada" is an easier dream to live inside to avoid taking action.
History would suggest that because Canadians rolled over so easily, they'll do it again. But of course that can't happen here. We're special.
For those interested, here's the latest from Quebec. Scroll down for English.
https://fearlesscanada.substack.com/p/covid-19-le-gouvernement-legault
https://fearlesscanada.substack.com/p/temoignage-assermente-revele-la-methode
It's a shit show folks. If shit is science, then we're ok, right?
It's almost assuredly happening in Quebec.
Legault tonight just said the curfews reduced contacts ergo saved lives. It went unchallenged.
This country is just about lost. No evidence of intelligent life anywhere.
FYI a lady died on site at a Red Deer Shoppers.
Another on insite in NFLD shoppers. Didn't make her 15 minutes wait.
Is the new untested shot out now?
FYI a lady at a Red Deer Shoppers died on site while waiting her 15 minutes.
A lady in NFLD same thing a couple days ago.
Is that new vaccine out now?
Report prepared by the Fiberals themselves. Link in latest from Steve Kirsch. https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/a-new-report-prepared-for-liberal?