Your Vaccine Injury is Only Reportable IF:
Your Vaccine Injury is Only Reportable IF:
It's all in the fine print.
We all have our beliefs as to how many actual vaccine injuries there are in Canada and there has been a lot of chatter about how small of a % of these vaccine injuries that will actually get reported…
So, I thought I’d break this down with a little information that is only going to upset you…and it doesn’t matter what your previous thoughts were.
It’s upsetting.
But you deserve to know.
While I have commended the Province of Alberta in reporting a lot of data on COVID, I will continue to scorch them on their lies and misrepresentation and reporting of the data inside of their COVID Dashboard.
If COVID was so lethal, you wouldn’t have to Back Pad the Mortality by 50% in the first year of COVID…
Moooooooooooving right along…
In the province of Alberta, at current, there are 2,760 Adverse Events Following Immunizations - (AEFI’s).
As in Alberta makes up 11.5% of the Canadian Population…but also makes up 2.16% of the total Adverse Events for Canada.
Now…why do you suppose that would be?
Lemme show ya…
At this link →here, you will see a PDF:
Active Surveillance and Reporting of Adverse Events Following Immunization (AEFI) Revised: February 25, 2022
This is from the Province of Alberta and it is the policy behind reporting adverse events following immunizations, last update, February 25th, 2022.
This policy lays out a few things that may help explain why Alberta is seemingly on the lower scale of AEFIs…it starts here:
When to report to Alberta Health Services
Health practitioners are to report an adverse event following immunization to AHS within 3 days of determining or being informed that a patient has experienced an adverse event following immunization unless it has already been reported.
There is a 3 day window in which health practitioners are to report an adverse event following the jabs.
3 DAYS.
If this isn’t done…don’t bother.
Next…
What to report to Alberta Health Services
Any “adverse event following immunization” defined as an unfavourable health occurrence experienced by a patient that:
a) follows immunization,
b) cannot be attributed to a pre-existing condition, and
c) meets one or more of the following criteria, as determined by a health practitioner:
i. the health occurrence is life threatening, could result in permanent disability, requires hospitalization or urgent medical attention, or for any other reason is considered to be of a serious nature;
ii. the health occurrence is unusual or unexpected, including, without limitation, an occurrence that A. has not previously been identified, or B. has previously been identified but is being reported at increased frequency;
iii. the health occurrence cannot be explained by anything in the patient’s medical history, including, without limitation, a recent disease or illness, or consumption of medication.
If unsure or if there are questions contact AHS.
So…within 3 days, Health Practitioners would need to suss out this information, do a full work up and report the AEFI.
Lemme ask ya something…
Have you had any blood-work done recently?
Like has your doctor requested you go to the lab and get some blood drawn for testing?
How long does it take you to get an appointment at the lab?
How long does it take them for results?
How long does it take you to hear back from your doctor?
If it took you 2 days to make an appointment for the lab and the lab took 2 days to process your sample and 2 days for your doctor to determine and communicate that you had a serious event following your vaccination…that reporting window closed.
That’s just on blood-work and the turnaround is never like this…ever!
What about booking a CT Scan? MRI? Chest X-Ray? Ultrasound?
You ever get into one of these tests in 3 days without having fallen out of a building or having been struck by oncoming traffic?
No?
Because health care, for however good or bad your believe it to be, is terribly inefficient, so wrapping a 3 day timeline around a doctors guess on and Adverse Reaction to a never-been-seen-before-in-history Jab, is planned failure.
This is only something you do if you don’t want to actually see any adverse events…and guess what?
Alberta is 11.5% of the Population of Canada and 2.6% of the AEFIs for Canada.
TA DA!
Okay…this is upsetting but isn’t really the crux of the true issues with Alberta Reporting.
It comes in this disclaimer, pertaining to AESI’s (Adverse Events of Special Interest)…
“Reportable if: Onset within x days of COVID immunization:”
As in, even if a doctor was to identify serious Adverse Events Following Immunizations and get them reported in 3 days…the window on how long your condition happened after the jab is now being put into questionable question.
First Example:
If you went into your doctor with a restricted range of movement in a joint, but took 2 weeks to get an appointment to see your doctor, and even if he was able to identify this as Acute Aseptic Arthritis, ON-THE-SPOT their not afforded the 3 days it takes to report the incident.
Feel me?
But wait…it get’s worse.
WAY WORSE!
Because even with the Onset Period they allow, it’s not in line with the Posted Information that Pfizer obtained in their clinical testing.
You remember all of those dumps of data?
In one of them, was a document called - 5.3.6-postmarketing-experience.
And in this document, it lays out the AESIs, with a fair amount of information on these Special Events, but even these need a lot more vetting and should allow for a lot longer onset than what the Province of Alberta is…
Here we go.
According to Alberta…if, following the vaccines, you have Acute Kidney Injury…there is a Reportable if: clause with the onset of 7 days.
However…from the Pfizer Postmarketing Document…their information states that it can take from less than 24 hours and all the way up to 15 days:
But wait, there’s more to cover here.
The first thing is that there were 69 cases of Renal AESIs that included Acute Kidney Injury…of these 23 were fatal.
That’s right…1 in 3 of these cases or 33.3% ended in DEATH!
15 more of them weren’t even resolved…which means that there could be another 5 more deaths in that same group - given the 1:3 ratio add in the additional 22 Unknown and this number of deaths becomes 35 out of 69 or 50%!
Of these…2 of these cases came from Canada…and the Pfizer Postmarketing Data document is only current up to February 28, 2021, where the latest update on it is February 25, 2022 - 1 full year following!
As in…Alberta is completely ignoring data on a case where severity results in 1 in 3 people dying because…REASONS!?!?!?
That’s actually pretty scary to think about, isn’t it?
Given length of this current substack and the amount of information that need be covered…this is just part 1. I’ve got a pile more AEFIs and AESIs to cover and the reason where “Safe and Effective”, especially on the Safety is actually being ignored.
Though this is just Alberta that I am covering, can you imagine that this same thing occurs only in Alberta? Or does this seem like something that carries throughout Canada and Globally?
What do we really get to see…that’s reported by the same people who keep telling you to, “Get the Jabs”?
More on this later in Part 2.
Since the leading cause of death in Alberta is "Unknown", ahead of heart attacks, strokes, etc (the usual causes) I want to know why AHS is not investigating these deaths. IT'S THEIR JOB!
My confidence in that organization is now zero. Management all needs to be fired.
Sheldon you are a Canadian Hero.... you are doing the work that our disgusting, corrupt Public Health and Medical system is obfuscating. WTF!!! Crickets from regulatory bodies....totally captured and complicit in this democide.