37 Comments
User's avatar
ROBIN DAY's avatar

meanwhile, the Trudeau Regime quietly entered into an agreement with the USA and Mexico on mandated mRNA Jonestown Jabs for the bird flu, lockdowns and travel restrictions (read vaccine passports).

https://tnc.news/2024/06/25/vaccine-mandates-border-measures-part-of-updated-north-american-flu-pandemic-plan/

but don't worry, as bird flu vaccine trials shows that only 1 in 200 die from the jab. Will be interesting to see how gov't media sells mandated "Russian Roulette with a syringe".

https://jessicar.substack.com/p/1200-chance-of-death-in-context-of?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=516896&post_id=146034587&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=true&r=g4apn&triedRedirect=true&utm_medium=email

Expand full comment
Angie's avatar

Check out this Albertan's research.

https://rumble.com/user/nonvaxer420

Expand full comment
grrlrocks's avatar

Wow! He's on a roll... I'm watching the latest one posted, which is an Israeli researcher (in 2013?) high on his own ego re. nanobots being designed to use INSIDE YOU to release medication into your system and DECIDING AMONG THEMSELVES how much to give you and when (about 4:50 in)... Oh, and when they've damaged you "too much"... This is as far as I've gotten watching it, so there may be more horrors yet discussed. Beyond sick and twisted. https://rumble.com/v53h6vj-june-24-2024.html

Expand full comment
Bob Bichen's avatar

I think "bodies orphancies" should read: "body's orifices."

Expand full comment
Sheldon Yakiwchuk's avatar

I think you're right.

Great Catch, Bob. Corrected in the online version.

Expand full comment
Bob Bichen's avatar

I see you fixed "body's," but "orphancies" is still there.

Expand full comment
TRM's avatar

A grammar nazi after my own heart LOL

Expand full comment
Bob Bichen's avatar

There comes a point where it's more than just grammar and the meaning is completely lost. I actually looked up "orphancies" in case I was missing something.

Expand full comment
JimB's avatar

Also we must account for the fact there are persons who will disregard the entirety of a thesis based on a missed placed comma or undotted i.

Expand full comment
Bob Bichen's avatar

An undotted i is very hard to accomplish on the Internet.

Expand full comment
TRM's avatar

You actually looked it up? ROTFLMAO. Okay we really are 2 peas in a pod. I do that all the time.

Expand full comment
Bob Bichen's avatar

I'm fascinated watching the slow destruction of the English language, especially substitution of near sound-alikes. It's almost like listening to Ricky on Trailer Park Boys reading the Internet sometimes. Subject-verb agreement is a completely lost concept on the evening news and in major newspapers.

Expand full comment
Linelle MacDougal's avatar

I think Sheldon has it correct in this new world war of words ... what's another body orphancies ? Could have been on WANTED WORDS when CBC looked normal and not captured by a censored narrative.

Expand full comment
Luc Lelievre's avatar

Here's the reason why they are doing this:

https://x.com/RealJamesWoods/status/1803474277410431219?

Expand full comment
TRM's avatar

The misuse of the PCR process was known and admitted in a Manitoba court. The government's own expert, Chief Microbiologist and Laboratory Specialist Dr. Jared Bullard, admitted:

1) PCR test results do not verify infectiousness, and were never intended to be used to diagnose respiratory illnesses.

2) A person with Covid-19 is infectious for a one-to-two week period, non-viable (harmless) viral SARS-COV-2 fragments remain in the nose, and can be detected by a PCR test for up to 100 days after exposure.

3) The most accurate way to determine whether someone is actually infectious with Covid is to attempt to grow a cell culture in the lab from a patient sample.

4) Only 44% of the “positive” samples using a Ct of 18 returned a viable lab culture. Samples tested at a Ct of over 25, according to Dr. Bullard’s report, produced no viable lab cultures.

5) Both Dr. Bullard and Manitoba Chief Medical Officer Dr. Brent Roussin confirmed under cross-examination that Ct values are not provided to public health officials by laboratories. Dr. Roussin admitted that he could mandate that the Ct value be provided to him, but that he has not done so.

6) Manitoba has confirmed that it utilizes Ct’s of up to 40, and even 45 in some cases. This indicates “cases” resulting from such tests (above a Ct of 25) are almost certainly not actually infectious.

https://www.jccf.ca/manitoba-chief-microbiologist-and-laboratory-specialist-56-of-positive-cases-are-not-infectious/

So what Ct did we go to in Alberta? I'm willing to bet that all the provinces went along because "It's the WHO recommendation and Health Canada said to".

Expand full comment
Dean Stewart's avatar

excellent post and reminder. In Saskatchewan I did a FOI request, and I believe the PCR cycles ranged from 32 to 40 plus. even Faucci admitted that anything over 25 is not reliable. This is a quote from an article the CCCA posted "In Canada, there is no uniform testing standard. Laboratories in Ontario use Ct levels between 38- 40 [11]. Virologist, Dr. Julie Morrison of the University of California is quoted as saying, “I am shocked that people would think that a Ct value of 40 could represent a positive” [12]. Dr. Brenda Stadler, formerly Director of the Institute of Immunology at the University of Bern agrees having stated that, “even if the infectious viruses are long dead, a corona test can come back positive,

because the PCR method multiplies even a tiny fraction of the viral genetic material enough to be

detected” [13].

In July 2020, Dr. Anthony Fauci of the U.S National Institute of Allergies and Infectious Diseases

indicated that any COVID-19 testing results using a Ct level above 35 are almost certainly false

positives [14]. More significantly, a September 2021 publication demonstrated that 97% of PCR

test results were false positives [15]. Other studies have confirmed the 90-97% false positivity

rate especially in asymptomatic healthy individuals tested at airports and at work" https://www.canadiancovidcarealliance.org/all/covid-19-policy-critique-long-term-care-facilities/

Expand full comment
Bonnie Matheson's avatar

You must also keep in mind all the hypochondriacs that rushed to get tested and pumped full of poison. I know of many sheeple who still continue to "test" themselves due to a sniffle.govt promoted this vile act against canadians but many many canadians lined up as fast as they could .these people continue this charade wearing masks in public. STILL...doctors who followed what govt said around all have their licenses revoked until they get re-educated properly.

Over the decades of vaccines and inoculations, the medical association has created a multitude of hypochondriacs or addicts ,if you will, that create huge burdens on the health care system .doctors want to send you for test after yest after test..costing a fortune. We do not need annual check ups,annual.mammographies ,annual colon cancer testing, annual bone density tests. Doctors want to send you to get you radiated and spend tax dollars stupidly. Yes,they created hypochondriacs to fill their pockets with each visit. Govt created it. Hypochondriacs continue to feed it.

Expand full comment
Freeq O’Nature's avatar

I’m still looking for all the “most Canadians” who supposedly now see the light.

Expand full comment
Jerome Armstrong's avatar

Its a win! That's how I felt when we won the mask war in Fairfax County. And it meant a lot to me cause my children could now go to school. And after Youngkin won, the whole tide shifted against masks in schools and it was finished, not just in Virginia but most of the States.

Expand full comment
Dean Stewart's avatar

excellent find and great news. Thanks for posting this. There is also the Canada Labour Code and genetic testing 247.98 (1) The following definitions apply in this Division.

genetic test, in relation to an employee, means a test that analyzes the employee’s DNA, RNA or chromosomes for purposes such as the prediction of disease or vertical transmission risks, or monitoring, diagnosis or prognosis. (test génétique)

Marginal note:Genetic test

(2) Every employee is entitled not to undergo or be required to undergo a genetic test.

also outlined in Genetic non-discrimination act

Expand full comment
Angie's avatar

And Sections 184(1) and 430(5) of the Criminal Code of Canada which prohibit the warrantless search and seizure of our biometrics using Smart (AI) nanotechnology biosensors embedded in masks, tests and jabs for surveillance under the skin via the Internet of Bio-Nano Things and the WBAN.

https://rumble.com/user/nonvaxer420

Expand full comment
TRM's avatar

excellent info Thanks

Expand full comment
JimB's avatar

https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/news/newsroom/news-releases/2020/11/johns-hopkins-researchers-engineer-tiny-shape-changing-machines-that-deliver-medicine-efficiently-to-the-gi-tract

Check out second pic…..

Fast Facts

CLICK TO TWEET

Inspired by a parasitic worm, researchers at @HopkinsMedicine & @HopkinsEngineer team up to design “theragrippers” to deliver medicine to GI tract. ›

Fast Facts

CLICK TO TWEET

Problem: extended-release drugs pass too quickly thru GI tract. Solution: @HopkinsMedicine & @HopkinsEngineer design dust-sized machines that snap to colonic walls and release medicine gradually. ›

Expand full comment
Toxicanadian's avatar

They post a tonne of Sabrina Wallace's vids too if you want to get into the WBAN side of things. 😵‍💫

Expand full comment
JimB's avatar

Thank you , adding to the files ,,,,, I was aware of nv420….. its been a bit since I checked out his info

Expand full comment
WillB's avatar

You are 100% correct here, and again, I was 'screaming', insert air quotes, this from the ledge grounds, called an asshole, lost my family, friends and career.

I suppose I didn't coddle well, in retrospect. Why?

Because i saw this death cult for what it is. And i see no politician that sat on their hands as useful.

It would be dangerous to even try this.

Especially now.

Like I've said before, I'm a terrible martyr. And this will not fly at 2.0.

All one had to do was read the quarantine act, the Bill of Rights, which still IS valid and the horse shit Whatever freedoms act Trudeau sr. Dangfangled.

It wasn't hard to figure out what was going on.

Kenney should be on trial along with that health lady, name?, i cannot remember. Wad that Bonnie Henry? I know the one here filled to Communistan BC.

All jailed.

If your a first responder on gestapo mode, back away, tell your family you love them. You won't be coming home this round.

Not sorry.

Expand full comment
Claudette Leece's avatar

Great news Sheldon

Expand full comment
Bob Bichen's avatar

Unfortunately, this paragraph will not cover workplace medical rape.

Expand full comment
Mrs H's avatar

Please explain. Interested foreigner. Cheers.

Expand full comment
Bob Bichen's avatar

As Ruth said below, I lost my job for almost eight months for not willing to be injected with deadly and maiming, ineffective experimental gene therapy, because Crime Minister Turdeau mandated Covid jabs in federally regulated jobs, even for subcontractors that weren't on-site! As a short term alternative to those that hadn't yet gotten their "fully vaccinated" status (two jabs at the time) they insisted on twice weekly medical rape in the form of useless PCR testing. As a further injustice, the employment insurance that every Canadian is forced to pay into was denied in a blatant act of insurance fraud.

Expand full comment
WillB's avatar

Those are human rights violations. Currently in that process, I won, and the contractor refuses my meager compensation request I was asked to give. Now those corrupt bastards are investigating.

Where should I send the payment? From my grave, that's how long these bureaucrats will take.

They thought sorry was going to be what I wanted from my employer.

Man, they were wrong.

Expand full comment
Ruth's avatar

Many Canadian companies mandated jabs. If you didn’t take a jab you were placed on unpaid leave, or fired (still happening). 🤬

Expand full comment
Angie's avatar

Individual workers must lay criminal charges in the provincial court of your city against the boss who administered the mask, test and jab policies. You must lay charges yourself under Section 504 of the Criminal Code. Cowards in policing are complicit. There is no statute of limitations on indictable offenses in Canada. Lay charges under Sections184(1) and 430(5) for warrantless search and seizure of your biometrics using AI nanotechnology biosensors embedded in masks, tests and jabs for surveillance under the skin via the Internet of Bio-Nano Things.

https://rumble.com/user/nonvaxer420

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment deleted
Jun 27, 2024
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
TRM's avatar

99% of the doctors are nothing but pharma cartel whores.

Ask every doctor and nurse the "Pro or Ho" questions.

Is your doctor a medical professional or a paid whore for the pharma cartel? Some simple questions for your doctor to determine if they are a "Pro or Ho":

Q1) "Should healthy children under the age of 12 get the covid vaccine?".

If the answer isn't "NO" then you have a "Ho". There is no "yes" or "it depends". The IFR for healthy kids is so far to the right of the decimal that they have a statistically ZERO chance of dying from covid. It is of zero benefit for them to get the shots. It also is of zero benefit to anyone else because they will still get it and transmit it, injected or not.

Q2) "Does the covid vaccine stay at the injection site?".

If the answer isn't "No" then you are talking to a "Ho". They usually lie by saying "Mostly" or "Most of it stays but some goes to the lymph nodes" which is a blatant lie. Pfizer's own biodistribution study released in May 2021 by a court granted FOIA request clearly shows well over half is gone from the injection site within 48 hours and your liver, spleen, adrenal glands and ovaries (females) are the 4 hardest hit. Page 45 here:

https://www.tga.gov.au/sites/default/files/foi-2389-06.pdf

or you can show them the colorized version of the page 45 chart which is easier to see:

https://i.postimg.cc/9FG259tR/Pfizer-bio-distribution-Australia.png

The great thing about these questions is they won't know why you're asking them unless you tell them. You don't have to be "mallet to forehead" blunt like me. You can be subtle. If the doc asks why you're asking just say "I've heard both so I thought I'd ask".

ASK YOUR DOCTOR.

Expand full comment