That response from Tim is exactly how I'd imagine a guy like that would respond. What's with all these 'experts' playing one on TV? Nye's an engineer, Gates is literally a monopolistic felon high school drop out, De Grasse-Tyson is an astrophysicist with no papers to his name who talks out of his ass and lane sounding like a dope. Suzuki is a lab researcher, and Caulfield's a lawyer. NONE of these people are experts in their fields and would get their lunch handed to them in a straight up MMA debate with actual experts from vaccinology to climate change. They're a tedious spent force who had the one-way megaphone for 15-minutes too long.
But this 'i won't dignify the other side with a debate' ploy is all the rage. From Gorski to Offit to Hotex to Topol. These guys won't face the heat because, like Fauci, they're the science and are the gatekeepers to it - in their minds.
The other day I read Hitzlik of the LA Times throw a hissy fit (L.A's Andre Picard) about Stanford daring to have a conference organized by Bhattachayra. In his hit-piece-shill tripe he linked to a 'massive' study that conclusively showed lockdowns worked. Scroll down and you see it was faded by Gates and Bloomberg. Uh-huh. Tell is more bull shit, Mike.
Would I love to see Caulfield stuck in an elevator with Bridle and Jessica Rose.
The guy constantly links to leftist publications like Axios and Luke Lebrun while ignoring Cochrane and Alex Berenson. He thinks some of us don't notice it.
What irritates me about these people is the certitude of their positions. NOTHING is written in stone ESPECIALLY science.
And here's the kicker. For his 'work', he was awarded an Order of Canada. Now, I started taking Nobels and Orders (and Oscars) with a large grain of coarse salt when Arafat got a peace prize and Morgantaler an Order. It's not a coincide both he and Picard were rewarded with Scooby-snacks.
Dr Bridle (an actual career vaccinologist) has torn this guy to pieces many Substacks ago. Tim is nothing but a shill for big pharma and a lap dog for jt.
He's also spoken at various events, specifically An Injection of Truth. I love Dr.Bridle, I would love for him to debate either Caulfield or Fisman, but neither will.
Blows my mind how guys like Caulfield act like the only reason vaccine hesitancy is on the rise is because of "disimismalinformation" as if there are no other possible explanations or reasons.
The mandates and coercive action opened the floodgates to millions of people reconsidering vaccines and what they represent.
Geniuses. These people run "public health" and couldn't see forcing something into people against their will wasn't going to come with unintended consequences? Except here, it was entirely foreseeable. What planet do they live on to think they can ruin people's lives in this way and not expect some kind of backlash if not payback?
Ethics - aside from common sense - was the first casualty of all this and Caulfield played his part.
Johnny Dollar. Still reading comments. Your last sentence was " Ethics aside from commen sence was the first casuality of all this and Caufield played his part". Bang on. And there's a long list of people that also played their part. What I can't understand is why. Why did so many play their part?
Thanks for sharing this, just in case some Calgarians want to sit through what Tim and others have to say in person. As irritating as it is, it IS good sometimes to see what those inside the mainstream bubble are thinking so that we know why/how our pro-vax friends are still thinking what they think. They get their views from guys like Tim. For people who do NOT know what Tim typically tweets about, you can scroll through the replies I recaptured here, Tim comes up a few times: https://followingthecovidscience.substack.com/p/twitterx-posts-show-depth-of-victimhood
To see what kind of 'studies' Tim and his fellow 'misinfo gurus' do, check out my response to this publication commissioned by the Council of Canadian Academies - https://followingthecovidscience.substack.com/p/when-the-misinformation-gurus-promote - You can see how those in their echo chambers cook up data that might make a bit of sense when seen from INSIDE the chamber, but certainly not to anyone experiencing real world conditions outside of it.
When Tucker Carlson came to Alberta, Tim apparently went to go see him, and sat down to write about what a misinformation spreader Tucker was. This was the FIRST TIME that I saw Tim actually referencing any STUDIES -- he gave us a look into his echo chamber. Even a lay person like me could see the flaws with the studies he cited. https://followingthecovidscience.substack.com/p/tim-or-tucker-who-is-the-misinformation. Dr. Bridle of course did a more professional rebuttal of Tim's "evidence" here: https://viralimmunologist.substack.com/p/what-is-worse-than-a-liar? I had offered the Walrus a chance to provide a counterpoint to Tim's article there, by having them run portions of Dr. Bridle's piece but no one took up the offer! Instead, they ran some other misinfo type thing from him again recently. :-(.
Too bad Dr Bridle wasn't on the panel to have a "debate" with him regarding his medical knowledge that you'd think would have changed by now since science especially experimental science should always be questioned but maybe that too much common sense and farrrrrrrright or something . On another note , I wondered about the new voting machine they used for the oh so close elections in BC . Asking google ,it gave me some bizarre name so I went to my trusted AI source and it is something called Dominion Voting Machine . Seemed I heard that name before : "Georgia election results" and to this day still unsettled how it was hacked , however security people and hacks say - not too bad to do . With the results hanging by a finger nail out West , and the manipulations that have already gone on with our elections : see Sam Cooper's The Bureau, and I think like tyrant now , how about making the results so slim , go to recount , and low and behold the results come in certainly for those with the current accepted narrative .and I bet the newspaper is already printed the front page news - hope I'm wrong .
That response from Tim is exactly how I'd imagine a guy like that would respond. What's with all these 'experts' playing one on TV? Nye's an engineer, Gates is literally a monopolistic felon high school drop out, De Grasse-Tyson is an astrophysicist with no papers to his name who talks out of his ass and lane sounding like a dope. Suzuki is a lab researcher, and Caulfield's a lawyer. NONE of these people are experts in their fields and would get their lunch handed to them in a straight up MMA debate with actual experts from vaccinology to climate change. They're a tedious spent force who had the one-way megaphone for 15-minutes too long.
But this 'i won't dignify the other side with a debate' ploy is all the rage. From Gorski to Offit to Hotex to Topol. These guys won't face the heat because, like Fauci, they're the science and are the gatekeepers to it - in their minds.
The other day I read Hitzlik of the LA Times throw a hissy fit (L.A's Andre Picard) about Stanford daring to have a conference organized by Bhattachayra. In his hit-piece-shill tripe he linked to a 'massive' study that conclusively showed lockdowns worked. Scroll down and you see it was faded by Gates and Bloomberg. Uh-huh. Tell is more bull shit, Mike.
Would I love to see Caulfield stuck in an elevator with Bridle and Jessica Rose.
The guy constantly links to leftist publications like Axios and Luke Lebrun while ignoring Cochrane and Alex Berenson. He thinks some of us don't notice it.
What irritates me about these people is the certitude of their positions. NOTHING is written in stone ESPECIALLY science.
And here's the kicker. For his 'work', he was awarded an Order of Canada. Now, I started taking Nobels and Orders (and Oscars) with a large grain of coarse salt when Arafat got a peace prize and Morgantaler an Order. It's not a coincide both he and Picard were rewarded with Scooby-snacks.
Next up, David Fisman.
Bah.
Johnny Dollar. Trying to catch up on some substack articles and just read your comment. As always love your comments. And pretty much agree with them.
Dr Bridle (an actual career vaccinologist) has torn this guy to pieces many Substacks ago. Tim is nothing but a shill for big pharma and a lap dog for jt.
He's also spoken at various events, specifically An Injection of Truth. I love Dr.Bridle, I would love for him to debate either Caulfield or Fisman, but neither will.
And another thing.
Blows my mind how guys like Caulfield act like the only reason vaccine hesitancy is on the rise is because of "disimismalinformation" as if there are no other possible explanations or reasons.
The mandates and coercive action opened the floodgates to millions of people reconsidering vaccines and what they represent.
Geniuses. These people run "public health" and couldn't see forcing something into people against their will wasn't going to come with unintended consequences? Except here, it was entirely foreseeable. What planet do they live on to think they can ruin people's lives in this way and not expect some kind of backlash if not payback?
Ethics - aside from common sense - was the first casualty of all this and Caulfield played his part.
Johnny Dollar. Still reading comments. Your last sentence was " Ethics aside from commen sence was the first casuality of all this and Caufield played his part". Bang on. And there's a long list of people that also played their part. What I can't understand is why. Why did so many play their part?
I can't think of anything I would like to avoid more than this. However, if Byram Bridle was invited, I would be all over it!
Thanks for sharing this, just in case some Calgarians want to sit through what Tim and others have to say in person. As irritating as it is, it IS good sometimes to see what those inside the mainstream bubble are thinking so that we know why/how our pro-vax friends are still thinking what they think. They get their views from guys like Tim. For people who do NOT know what Tim typically tweets about, you can scroll through the replies I recaptured here, Tim comes up a few times: https://followingthecovidscience.substack.com/p/twitterx-posts-show-depth-of-victimhood
One of your commenters mentioned Dr. Bridle's substacks - Dr B has often commented on Tim's 'work' https://viralimmunologist.substack.com/archive (search Caulfield).
To see what kind of 'studies' Tim and his fellow 'misinfo gurus' do, check out my response to this publication commissioned by the Council of Canadian Academies - https://followingthecovidscience.substack.com/p/when-the-misinformation-gurus-promote - You can see how those in their echo chambers cook up data that might make a bit of sense when seen from INSIDE the chamber, but certainly not to anyone experiencing real world conditions outside of it.
When Tucker Carlson came to Alberta, Tim apparently went to go see him, and sat down to write about what a misinformation spreader Tucker was. This was the FIRST TIME that I saw Tim actually referencing any STUDIES -- he gave us a look into his echo chamber. Even a lay person like me could see the flaws with the studies he cited. https://followingthecovidscience.substack.com/p/tim-or-tucker-who-is-the-misinformation. Dr. Bridle of course did a more professional rebuttal of Tim's "evidence" here: https://viralimmunologist.substack.com/p/what-is-worse-than-a-liar? I had offered the Walrus a chance to provide a counterpoint to Tim's article there, by having them run portions of Dr. Bridle's piece but no one took up the offer! Instead, they ran some other misinfo type thing from him again recently. :-(.
Finally, if you missed Dr. Bridle's recent testimony at the Vancouver NCI, I summarized pieces here: https://followingthecovidscience.substack.com/p/when-dr-byram-bridle-speaks-everyone. He was on fire, passionately demonstrating many examples of Pfizer, FDA and Health Canada Fraud... share widely!
Tim's a paid nudger, every country has one now
It's the global SOP for big pharma since the h1n1 scamdemic
Thanks for the heads up! Should be entertaining.
WTF is right. They got that part right. Shouldn't have too much trouble selling out a library with drag queens.
Honk Honk!
Go gettem 💪💪
It’s open to the public so It would be great if some real experts would attend and help set them straight 😉
It’s a good thing I’ll be out of town; I don’t think I could contain my anger if I attended. #RIPCharlie #RIPAlexander
I don’t see a date on the WTF Poster. Is that a secret? Or am I blind?
November 12th.
Thanks Sheldon, I would like to tune in to that orgy but unfortunately, I am out of country by then.
Too bad Dr Bridle wasn't on the panel to have a "debate" with him regarding his medical knowledge that you'd think would have changed by now since science especially experimental science should always be questioned but maybe that too much common sense and farrrrrrrright or something . On another note , I wondered about the new voting machine they used for the oh so close elections in BC . Asking google ,it gave me some bizarre name so I went to my trusted AI source and it is something called Dominion Voting Machine . Seemed I heard that name before : "Georgia election results" and to this day still unsettled how it was hacked , however security people and hacks say - not too bad to do . With the results hanging by a finger nail out West , and the manipulations that have already gone on with our elections : see Sam Cooper's The Bureau, and I think like tyrant now , how about making the results so slim , go to recount , and low and behold the results come in certainly for those with the current accepted narrative .and I bet the newspaper is already printed the front page news - hope I'm wrong .
And it just keeps going... *sigh*