Thank-you so much for the link from British Columbia. Just finished downloading and reading it. I read the Vancouver Sun's article when it came out. It was great having a chance to read the emails between Bonnie Henry and all. She was briefly on Global news today and she looked terrible. She actually looked unhealthy. A guilty conscience! Can't wait for her scheduled court date to start. The whole lot of them need to be dragged through the courts. Will we get justice? That remains to be seen.
"Where Is The Pandemic? According To The BC Government Records Hospitalizations and ICU admissions in BC During the Covid-19 Pandemic Did Not Increase Compared to the Previous Years"
Ontario data has always been buggy...that's a large part of why I never started drilling into it too much. Would need an FOI on their emails and data to actually verify.
Kudos to Sheldon and the many other capable individuals for persistently acquiring this data and making it understandable for the general public. You are all heroes of a very special kind!!!
The rate of serious adverse events is even higher if you consider the number of people vaccinated rather than doses administered. At 9,515 serious events reported and 32.475 million receiving at least one dose (as of May 22), the rate would be just over 1 in 3,500 vaccinated people. Can that really be described as “rare”?
These are just cases that are REPORTED. My friend who had Bell's Palsy as a child and with aggressive treatment it subsided, has had two jabs and the Bell's Palsy came back with a vengeance after the first jab. Still, she went to get the second one. Two different companies - mix and match I guess. Also, she has been having chest pain. She does not link these adverse events/serious issues to the jab, since both were months after she got vaxxed.
Sheldon, can you extrapolate how many injured in Canada that could possibly be? Do we have a sense of that? I know others who have had cancers come back out of remission. They didn't report it because it was post jab and couldn't make the connection.
It's an impossible task. Chronic inflammation leads to chronic diseases. Where there may have been some minor injury, the vaccines are exposing them by increasing them in severity of condition and faster than the immune systems can tackle them.
It's like trying to put out a fire with gasoline.
These won't show up on AE reports because the conditions that are accelerated by them won't be linked. We will only be able to see these in All Cause mortality and even at this, we can only speculate.
I hear you and of course you are correct. I'm just thinking that many specialists in the US and around the world have guesstimated that up to [fill in] % are not reported. And since the data in Canada is so skewed [Ontario confuses me], it makes that task virtually impossible.
I'm hearing [anecdotally of course] that there is very little reporting by GPs and specialists. I mean, if you were the one giving the jabs, and your patient called you to tell you of an adverse event, would you feel good about that?
Also, wouldn't it be INTERESTING to see what kind of report doctors have to fill out in the event of an adverse reaction? My guess is there is something in there that might say: "only report an AE if the event is 2 weeks post-jab".
Passive reporting for AEs where we know certain conditions are created specifically by the vaccines is completely ineffective. The usage of these reporting systems was discussed in the FOI email dump and I think all provinces have struggled with this very same thing and have created rules that make it impossible to gather meaningful information.
If they don't accept certain conditions or the reporting is disallowed after a certain time frame, then it completely ignores trends that may be linked to the vaccines.
It'd be a great topic to dig into, now that we are seeing how poorly these tools are being used.
Lots of DD, will see if I can at least do a small dive into it.
What is it that you don't understand. I'll see if I can do a video to explain that away.
I appreciate that a lot of folk are still confused after the breakdowns and it's important to me that everybody understands...so, tell me what you need explained and I'll break it down.
I have had a few people who have volunteered to be my editors...I just lack the patience and just wildly hit the publish button before even proofing now.
Ha, I noticed that about random capitalization too. Not to mention, there are apostrophes in plurals where they don't belong. But I'll take bad grammar and truth instead of vice versa any day!
Thank you Sheldon for the great job you do crunching the numbers. It is a task beyond my abilities and I so appreciate that you share your findings with us here and on Twitter. I wonder if you have seen Amazing Polly’s analysis of Bonnie’s emails on Bitchute? She doesn’t go as deeply into the numbers, but shows the connections to pharma and the collusion amongst government to spin negative outcomes. It’s a very comprehensive look into the dark side of our government. https://www.bitchute.com/video/CFyv1IWh1Vix/
Thank-you so much for the link from British Columbia. Just finished downloading and reading it. I read the Vancouver Sun's article when it came out. It was great having a chance to read the emails between Bonnie Henry and all. She was briefly on Global news today and she looked terrible. She actually looked unhealthy. A guilty conscience! Can't wait for her scheduled court date to start. The whole lot of them need to be dragged through the courts. Will we get justice? That remains to be seen.
They weren't kidding when they said 'crimes against humanity'. It really is the case.
This is GOLD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! FOI documents Released! Bonnie Henry's FORCED Email Dump Shows She Knew Bad Things Were Happening From The V's...
https://librti.com/view-video/foi-documents-released-bonnie-henry-s
SHARE, far and wide to help save humanity......we need this one now before they lock us down and mandate more poisons this fall........
Thanks for the link to Librti. I had forgotten about this website and you reminded me about it. Loved the video.
You are most welcome.....I hope something positive comes out of it...
It is truly sickening what they (the govt, health care, etc) have done to people.
They also knew that there was no Pandemic
"Where Is The Pandemic? According To The BC Government Records Hospitalizations and ICU admissions in BC During the Covid-19 Pandemic Did Not Increase Compared to the Previous Years"
https://lionessofjudah.substack.com/p/where-is-the-pandemic-according-to
Thanks for another great article! Does Ontario show similar patterns or are they hiding data?
Ontario data has always been buggy...that's a large part of why I never started drilling into it too much. Would need an FOI on their emails and data to actually verify.
Kudos to Sheldon and the many other capable individuals for persistently acquiring this data and making it understandable for the general public. You are all heroes of a very special kind!!!
“When the province shifted to providing weekly COVID-19 data updates it changed how those deaths were calculated. The new system is that all deaths are counted if the person tested positive for the virus in the past 30 days, and then died – a calculation that would include car accidents.” From the following article. https://www.vancouverisawesome.com/local-news/covid-19-hospitalizations-in-bc-highest-since-february-5362290
So if you test positive for c19 but are asymptomatic or only get the sniffles and then 29 days later get hit by a bus... you die of Covid?
Probably all Provinces do that, it increases the Covid19 deaths so people continue with the jabs.
Thank you for all of this!
The rate of serious adverse events is even higher if you consider the number of people vaccinated rather than doses administered. At 9,515 serious events reported and 32.475 million receiving at least one dose (as of May 22), the rate would be just over 1 in 3,500 vaccinated people. Can that really be described as “rare”?
https://thenationalpulse.com/2022/06/16/severe-covid-19-uncommon-in-unvaccinated-individuals-survey-finds/
I am one of the 18,500 participants in the Vaxx Control Group. They put out their first few months of data and published it.
It was taken down.
I think we need Deena Hinshaws email Verna Yiu emails and the College of Physicians and Surgeon's! For a start.
Then Kenney Shandro and Copping.
These are just cases that are REPORTED. My friend who had Bell's Palsy as a child and with aggressive treatment it subsided, has had two jabs and the Bell's Palsy came back with a vengeance after the first jab. Still, she went to get the second one. Two different companies - mix and match I guess. Also, she has been having chest pain. She does not link these adverse events/serious issues to the jab, since both were months after she got vaxxed.
Sheldon, can you extrapolate how many injured in Canada that could possibly be? Do we have a sense of that? I know others who have had cancers come back out of remission. They didn't report it because it was post jab and couldn't make the connection.
It's an impossible task. Chronic inflammation leads to chronic diseases. Where there may have been some minor injury, the vaccines are exposing them by increasing them in severity of condition and faster than the immune systems can tackle them.
It's like trying to put out a fire with gasoline.
These won't show up on AE reports because the conditions that are accelerated by them won't be linked. We will only be able to see these in All Cause mortality and even at this, we can only speculate.
I hear you and of course you are correct. I'm just thinking that many specialists in the US and around the world have guesstimated that up to [fill in] % are not reported. And since the data in Canada is so skewed [Ontario confuses me], it makes that task virtually impossible.
I'm hearing [anecdotally of course] that there is very little reporting by GPs and specialists. I mean, if you were the one giving the jabs, and your patient called you to tell you of an adverse event, would you feel good about that?
Also, wouldn't it be INTERESTING to see what kind of report doctors have to fill out in the event of an adverse reaction? My guess is there is something in there that might say: "only report an AE if the event is 2 weeks post-jab".
Passive reporting for AEs where we know certain conditions are created specifically by the vaccines is completely ineffective. The usage of these reporting systems was discussed in the FOI email dump and I think all provinces have struggled with this very same thing and have created rules that make it impossible to gather meaningful information.
If they don't accept certain conditions or the reporting is disallowed after a certain time frame, then it completely ignores trends that may be linked to the vaccines.
It'd be a great topic to dig into, now that we are seeing how poorly these tools are being used.
Lots of DD, will see if I can at least do a small dive into it.
You need to explain this better.
You already understand it so it makes sense to you.
Please explain like you would to a 10 year old so every one can understand it.
Okay.
What is it that you don't understand. I'll see if I can do a video to explain that away.
I appreciate that a lot of folk are still confused after the breakdowns and it's important to me that everybody understands...so, tell me what you need explained and I'll break it down.
Awesome article as always, tweeted with delight!
the 79 cases in BC/59 cases in whole Canada was a true gem!
Sheldon, thanks for all your great work! I look forward to your posts!
Your capitalization scheme is something of a fun puzzle, I have a big spreadsheet that I’m using to help crack the code. No patterns emerging yet…
I have had a few people who have volunteered to be my editors...I just lack the patience and just wildly hit the publish button before even proofing now.
;)
Keep it real, as they say in the vernacular.
Ha, I noticed that about random capitalization too. Not to mention, there are apostrophes in plurals where they don't belong. But I'll take bad grammar and truth instead of vice versa any day!
Thank you Sheldon for the great job you do crunching the numbers. It is a task beyond my abilities and I so appreciate that you share your findings with us here and on Twitter. I wonder if you have seen Amazing Polly’s analysis of Bonnie’s emails on Bitchute? She doesn’t go as deeply into the numbers, but shows the connections to pharma and the collusion amongst government to spin negative outcomes. It’s a very comprehensive look into the dark side of our government. https://www.bitchute.com/video/CFyv1IWh1Vix/