The Results are Under Review - Mental Health, Part 2B

Or not 2B...The PSYOP

Carrying on for the 3rd stack segment, I’d said that I’d look at Mental Health and Wellness in 2 parts - this being the second.

If you haven’t been keeping up or just got here, you can get all caught up with the following 2 links.

Part 1

Part 2

From the last installment, “What in the fuck did you think was going to happen?”, it’d be easy to see and say, “but these were the same strategies applied globally, how is this Alberta?”, and this is a great question…one that I hope to answer.

You see, while the Vaccines were the Worlds Largest Medical Experiment, still ongoing, the methodology employed to gain compliance is the Largest Psychological Experiment and you can read all about the Alberta Specific Approach, directly from AHS documents →Link

This document was released in September of 2020, studies obviously taken between March and September as to HOW to make the masses compliant and who to actually focus on.

And from their Evidence Summary…

• Limited evidence suggests that distinct population groups may require distinct messaging to promote guideline adherence.

• No strategies for promoting adherence to public health COVID-19 guidelines have been robustly proven in the published scientific literature. The most promising strategies appear to be communications to increase knowledge about the pandemic and perceived threat of the virus. Moralistic messaging (e.g. linking physical distancing to being a good person/citizen) could produce problematic consequences such as ostracization of individuals who do not adhere to public health guidelines.

The most promising strategies - increase knowledge about the pandemic and perceived threat of the virus.

A lot of people fall back into the Novel - New Virus of COVID but it really wasn’t that NEW…I mean, we were coming out of Respiratory Virus Season, when influenza miraculously disappeared, cases fell right off of a cliff and we’d seen footage from China where people were dropping dead in the streets…news footage from Italy, where hospitals were being overrun with COVID, in March of 2020…

But by the end of August - 6 Months after the first cases of COVID were SPECULATED in Alberta, there were a sum total of 237 cases and they’d confirmed exactly the same things that we still know today, which was the same things that the CDC had published about High Risk Cases, before the first case of COVID even hit the province.

People with Pre-Existing Health Conditions are at High Risk.

And while there were 8 people who were considered COVID Mortalities with No Pre-Existing Conditions (3.4%), Obesity was Excluded from the Comorbidities list, even though the vast amount of risk were in those who suffered from Consumption Related Illnesses and a sum total of only 5 mortalities were under the age of the High Risk by Age Stratification - 60 years old - 98% mortality in those over 60.

So, try to reconcile what the Provincial Healthcare Provider wanted to do…”The most promising strategies appear to be communications to increase knowledge about the pandemic and perceived threat of the virus.”, with what the results actually showed…with what they did for the next 2 years following.

Pure Psychological Warfare on the population of the province with daily updates from then CMOH - Dr. Deena Hinshaw, perpetuated through every legacy media channel in the province and updates through Social Media.

This was the plan, since September 17th, 2020.

It wasn’t about controlling risk, it was about controlling people.

You see, in this document, it lays out this strategy…

Accessing information through traditional news media (print; television; radio) is associated with greater guideline adherence, while use of social media is associated with a higher likelihood of endorsing conspiracy beliefs, factual misperceptions and lesser degrees of guideline adherence.

They knew that they’d have a battle on Social Media, because people could actually discuss what was happening, what the true risks were - None to the general population - but deemed this as “conspiracy beliefs, factual misperceptions”, which would lead to a “lesser degree of guideline adherence”.

And those that they intended to target?

Young, Healthy Men who identify as Conservative.

Wait what?

How did they even come to the conclusion that this group would have poor adherence and the most negative attitudes about public health guidelines?

They did some studies…that were used, by way of confirmation bias because of their WEAK to Moderate - Strength of Association…

Age - Weak.

Education - Weak

Knowledge about the pandemic - Weak

Politics - they used 6 Studies, where the strength of association was “Not reported in any study”, and used the explanation that “Consistent reports of greater political conservativism being linked to less compliance.

Read that again…

And then appreciate who the COVID-19 Scientific Advisory Group is made up of:

Oh?

But wait…it get’s worse…because they admitted to, instead of using literature specific to COVID-19 in crafting health messaging, that they’d work with behavioral scientists, the broader social psychology literature and established frameworks for influencing behavior change - The Behavior Change Wheel…even though the findings of this review was Questionable - they decided to go ahead with it anyways:

All of the fear porn, wildly spread over the last 3 years with legacy media, TV and Print, social media and all of those completely insane ideas that were implemented in my previous stack…was specific to the Province - even though they may have adopted some of this from other global sources, applied through this:

Modelling Data - that was always bullshit.

Environmental Restructuring - closing down of Non-Essential businesses.

Restrictions - nuff said.

Education - which was all lies.

Persuasion/Incentivization - like lotteries and gift cards

COERCION!!!

And exactly what does the LAW say about using these tactics to force people into compliance?

It’s assault and battery, because a physician may be liable in assault and batter when no consent was given at all, when the treatment went beyond or deviated significantly from that for which consent was given, or if consent to treatment was obtained through serious or fraudulent misrepresentation in what was explained to the patient.

This isn’t just the JABS, my friends.

It’s every single Non-Pharmaceutical Intervention that was applied in the Province of Alberta…because we are ALL the patients of AHS and all of their information was Fraudulent Misrepresentation in what was explained.

The psychological impacts of the NPIs will be felt for a really long time, while we still have no idea how long of long-term studies will be required on the vaccinations - at last look, I’d seen the Vax Spike was still found inside of people following 2 years post vaccination.

Remember - it goes in your arm, does it’s job and vanishes?

Yeah…that was bullshit too.

All stemming from a politically motivated leadership team in the AHS, wanting to control conservatives…even though there was no information to support this.

Look at the impacts of this on the most recent provincial election…

Look at how many seats were swayed towards NDP, based on the Healthcare Aspect of the province alone…and who’s been in control of this, the whole time?

Exactly.

There are a lot of other things I could bring in - including Data Fraud - into this, but I think with the information here, you get an great idea of why people need to go to prison, based on just a quick glance at how the Pandemic Measures impacted the Mental Health and Wellbeing of the province and what their actual intent was.

---