I read one article that said some of the corneal transplants had worked for years before the jab. Then the original transplanted cornea would have been totally unvaxxed. The vaccine in the recipient would have been the possible rejection trigger. I bet those rejections will never be listed as a jab adverse effect either even though it may be widespread.
I thought the same thing. Maybe the figures on transplant rejection should be watched too. I doubt the US tracks it closely. They seem to track absolutely nothing. Does Canada track these numbers? It may serve as another canary in the coal mine. Deaths due to rejection would never be linked to the jab by any government.
I’ll bet the CDC does track it. They do all kinds of tests. And they only ‘SEEM to track absolutely nothing’. They have admitted that they aren’t releasing data because a release would, in their words, “increase vaccine hesitantly”.
They know a hell of a lot more than they are telling us........
And this is another example that the Western world governments imposed a giant medical experiment on the population, under threat of job loss, access to medical care, access to loved ones in hospital/LTC, post-secondary and the ability to travel freely across the country. Criminals.
“I was just following orders” is no excuse. This determination has precedent from The Nuremberg Trials.
The best any of them can do now to reduce their culpability is to provide information on those above them initially directing this COVID campaign and evidence about who are currently now acting to suppress information to continue the ongoing injections in full knowledge of the danger.
Whistleblowers need an incentive: immunity if they can deliver explicit criminals.
It is a horrendous possibility Sheldon - thank you for highlighting it. It seems that the damage caused to the immune system via the jabs can be enduring. I would counsel anyone who took the shots to go to the FLCCC website & look at their post-jab protocols. (They have excellent treatment protocols for c19 as well). While Canadians STILL can’t get IVM, there are herbal alternatives. Dr. Marek also recommends fasting… it’s ever-evolving, so it’s worthwhile staying connected to FLCCC.
Ditto. I use daily as well as extended fasting. Activated charcoal was something my parents taught me - old school eastern bloc. If you’re interested in herbalism, there’s a great replay on this weekend called Remedy: https://remedy.thesacredscience.com/replay-page
Dave Asprey -- bio hacker extraordinaire -- swears by activated charcoal. He says we can take it every day... or at least much more often than when we are just feeling nauseous.
In all likelihood, SARS Cov2 (due to random mutations and recombinations) is no longer the beast it once was. For the untransfected individuals, it may not be much more than a cold (mild or severe) which wouldn't require any special or hard-to-come-by treatment (like IVM or HCL). Just a thought.
The most compelling part of the study IMO were the patients having received cornea transplants 20 years ago now experiencing rejection of the eye tissue post-jab.
How are the poison pushers going to spin this scenario?
You may not be a doctor, Sheldon, but I would trust you more with health matters at this point than most of the indoctrinated docs out there. At least I know you are not afraid to tell the truth!
I can't claim to know, but scroll down the comments to Marc Mullie (Dr.). As an ophthalmologist you may find some bread crumbs in his reply, associated links or perhaps a connection that can help you navigate.
I've not had the opportunity to read through it all yet, but will hopefully be a little more in the know by end of weekend.
Yakk (if I may call you that), thanks for posting this. I am an ophthalmologist and had seen this article.
You ask all the right questions. And yes this indicates severe inflammation in the whole body in general, because the cornea (window of the eye) is avascular, meaning it normally has no blood vessels in it so is not prone to inflammation. Imagine what rejection could be like for a kidney or another internal organ.
Here is my red-pill story in a nutshell. After being in the rabbit hole for 2.5 years, it is obvious to me for many reasons too numerous to detail here, that this is a global eugenics agenda.
Many courageous docs and scientists are not ashamed to say this, for example Mike Yeadon, Dolores Cahill, David Martin, Karen Kingston, Bryan Ardis, Sucharit Bhakdi, Roger Hodkinson, Richard Fleming and many others. Many others likely think it but won't outright say it for fear of losing their licences: perhaps Pierre Kory, Peter McCullough, Ryan Cole and others. It is the same for many substack journalists, for example Steve Kirsch or Alex Berenson will never broach the topic of eugenics, they would lose 80% of their followers.
Karen Kingston has done much work on patent digging. The spike protein is a stand-alone cytotoxic bioweapon and there are 7 patents and licences for 7 different SPs. No need for any virus.
I encourage everyone to explore Terrain Theory (TT) which explains why this has nothing to do with a 'virus', but is a direct intentional poisoning of humanity with a variety of toxins, including the so-called spike protein which is a bioweapon in itself. A good place to start for TT is Dr. Samantha Bailey's website:
Humanity has been intentionally poisoned on a global level ('virus' is the Latin word for poison). This whole charade has nothing to do with a virus or a vaccine, or public health. The virus idea was a subterfuge crafted on FEAR to get people to accept being jabbed with poisonous bioweapons. There is not a single extended family on this planet that won't be touched by this evil tragedy. People have started dropping dead in the streets or in their sleep ('SADS'), or having 'vaxxidents' in their cars, or dropping everywhere with Grand Mal seizures. This is only the beginning.
The Medical profession itself has also started dropping with illness and death, since about 94,000 docs were mandated to get jabs last year. Even worse with our precious nurses.
Graft rejection occurred anywhere from one day to six weeks after vaccination in all patients–some who underwent the procedure as far back as twenty years ago.
So if the graft happened 20 years ago, the donor in that case could not have been vaccinated with the covid-19 injections. How many of these donors were vaccinated with covid-19 is likely to be very low if not zero based on that statement though since that's the only statement, it's possible it's higher.
I wanted to put your comment under my updated post. You stated:
"It's just one piece of a very large puzzle.
Vaccinated organs in Vaccinated Recipients.
Vaccinated organs in unvaccinated recipients.
Unvaccinated organs in Vaccinated Recipients.
Most of what I've read is that the Vaccinated Recipients are having a much higher rate of rejection with organs...but nothing I've read specifies where the organs have come from and so far nothing available (that I've found), on unvaccinated receiving vaccinated organs."
Except this study did say that the procedure occurred as far back as 20 years ago so those donors were not vaccinated against covid-19 but could have been vaccinated against other things. The rejection occurred between 1-6 weeks after the covid-19 vaccine which suggests that in that case, it was unvaccinated organs in vaccinated recipients. Given that they state as far back as 20 years, it seems likely that most if not all of these cases fall under the same bucket but it's possible that there was only 1 or a few outliers where the rest had a very recent transplant in which case the rest could be in the vaccinated organ/vaccinated recipient bucket.
This article doesn't seem to look into the vaccinated organ in unvaccinated. We can't rule this out for the futur but this study didn't seem to look at this bucket.
I received a kidney 5 weeks ago today. I am unvaxxed. I have no idea whether the donor was vaxxed or not. I am proceeding as if he or she was by relying on the FLCCC protocol. I have no idea what else to do. I will be going back on intermittent fasting just as I did prior to surgery. I specifically requested that I receive an unvaxxed kidney but was told that the team could not promise such a thing because they were not willing to ask the family about their loved one' vaccination status. This is a little hard to believe since the practice in the province is to keep data on everyone who enters the hospital. One can state that the are or are not vaxxed or they can decline to answer. Finally, I refused receiving blood in the event it was needed. The likelihood of needing blood was low to begin with.
I would rather not state where at this time. Approval didn't come easily. I spent several hours defending my position. A Canadian can seek transplantation from any team in Canada. There aren't that many so it would not be difficult to find an unvaxxed "friendly" team willing to work with the unvaxxed. The fact that I am in good physical shape, I suspect, helped me.
You have to hook up with Tim Goyetche.He is a naturopath who can tell you so much about the immune reactions. You both are doing parellel studies. Thank you for researching this.
I clearly remember a terrible story Rebel News covered of a woman with double corneal implants who began to suffer rejection in both eyes after 20 years with no issues. She was forced to get the vax by her employer and even worse, after telling them about her problem, they still insisted she get the second. I often think of her and wonder how her story turned out, never saw a follow-up.
I read one article that said some of the corneal transplants had worked for years before the jab. Then the original transplanted cornea would have been totally unvaxxed. The vaccine in the recipient would have been the possible rejection trigger. I bet those rejections will never be listed as a jab adverse effect either even though it may be widespread.
20 years after having the procedure, that is really only supposed to last around 5, is rejected after the jabs.
That too is terrifying.
What other organs that were done pre-vax will now be rejected post?
YIKES!
I thought the same thing. Maybe the figures on transplant rejection should be watched too. I doubt the US tracks it closely. They seem to track absolutely nothing. Does Canada track these numbers? It may serve as another canary in the coal mine. Deaths due to rejection would never be linked to the jab by any government.
I’ll bet the CDC does track it. They do all kinds of tests. And they only ‘SEEM to track absolutely nothing’. They have admitted that they aren’t releasing data because a release would, in their words, “increase vaccine hesitantly”.
They know a hell of a lot more than they are telling us........
And this is another example that the Western world governments imposed a giant medical experiment on the population, under threat of job loss, access to medical care, access to loved ones in hospital/LTC, post-secondary and the ability to travel freely across the country. Criminals.
“I was just following orders” is no excuse. This determination has precedent from The Nuremberg Trials.
The best any of them can do now to reduce their culpability is to provide information on those above them initially directing this COVID campaign and evidence about who are currently now acting to suppress information to continue the ongoing injections in full knowledge of the danger.
Whistleblowers need an incentive: immunity if they can deliver explicit criminals.
It is a horrendous possibility Sheldon - thank you for highlighting it. It seems that the damage caused to the immune system via the jabs can be enduring. I would counsel anyone who took the shots to go to the FLCCC website & look at their post-jab protocols. (They have excellent treatment protocols for c19 as well). While Canadians STILL can’t get IVM, there are herbal alternatives. Dr. Marek also recommends fasting… it’s ever-evolving, so it’s worthwhile staying connected to FLCCC.
Fasting will be part of my own personal lifetime protocols...
And as of late, I've been diving into the use of oral Activated Charcoal and possible benefits - holistically, not just in the jabbed.
Lots of great information available for n=1 trials.
;)
Ditto. I use daily as well as extended fasting. Activated charcoal was something my parents taught me - old school eastern bloc. If you’re interested in herbalism, there’s a great replay on this weekend called Remedy: https://remedy.thesacredscience.com/replay-page
Dave Asprey -- bio hacker extraordinaire -- swears by activated charcoal. He says we can take it every day... or at least much more often than when we are just feeling nauseous.
Canadians can get IVM. They must think outside the stall...I mean box
:D
Yes there are some that recommend ivermax, which should be available
In all likelihood, SARS Cov2 (due to random mutations and recombinations) is no longer the beast it once was. For the untransfected individuals, it may not be much more than a cold (mild or severe) which wouldn't require any special or hard-to-come-by treatment (like IVM or HCL). Just a thought.
I agree. However these are recommended by FLCCC as part of the post-jab protocol…
Oh yes. Good point.
I’ll never cease fighting a government that restricts effective treatment.
Amen to that.
The most compelling part of the study IMO were the patients having received cornea transplants 20 years ago now experiencing rejection of the eye tissue post-jab.
How are the poison pushers going to spin this scenario?
By declaring each and every case as "unrelated to the vaccine" and declaring themselves 'baffled'
You can only play dumb for so long.....
The ‘Unknown Killers’ MO.
You may not be a doctor, Sheldon, but I would trust you more with health matters at this point than most of the indoctrinated docs out there. At least I know you are not afraid to tell the truth!
Great article.
i’ve wondered if we’re witnessing the collapse of the human race.
the end of humanity (as we know it).
This is a shocking finding and I do not understand the mechanism
I can't claim to know, but scroll down the comments to Marc Mullie (Dr.). As an ophthalmologist you may find some bread crumbs in his reply, associated links or perhaps a connection that can help you navigate.
I've not had the opportunity to read through it all yet, but will hopefully be a little more in the know by end of weekend.
Aww heck, give 'em a couple of months, they'll have jabs for that too!!
You're all 'Silver Linings', hey?
Love it!
Never let a good crisis go to waste.
biotech: the final solution.
WOW!!! BUT NOT SURPRISING
Yakk (if I may call you that), thanks for posting this. I am an ophthalmologist and had seen this article.
You ask all the right questions. And yes this indicates severe inflammation in the whole body in general, because the cornea (window of the eye) is avascular, meaning it normally has no blood vessels in it so is not prone to inflammation. Imagine what rejection could be like for a kidney or another internal organ.
Here is my red-pill story in a nutshell. After being in the rabbit hole for 2.5 years, it is obvious to me for many reasons too numerous to detail here, that this is a global eugenics agenda.
Many courageous docs and scientists are not ashamed to say this, for example Mike Yeadon, Dolores Cahill, David Martin, Karen Kingston, Bryan Ardis, Sucharit Bhakdi, Roger Hodkinson, Richard Fleming and many others. Many others likely think it but won't outright say it for fear of losing their licences: perhaps Pierre Kory, Peter McCullough, Ryan Cole and others. It is the same for many substack journalists, for example Steve Kirsch or Alex Berenson will never broach the topic of eugenics, they would lose 80% of their followers.
Karen Kingston has done much work on patent digging. The spike protein is a stand-alone cytotoxic bioweapon and there are 7 patents and licences for 7 different SPs. No need for any virus.
https://usawatchdog.com/7-different-patented-poisons-in-cv19-injections-karen-kingston/
David Martin says the same thing:
https://usawatchdog.com/up-to-700-million-worldwide-will-die-from-cv19-vax-by-2028-dr-david-martin/
I encourage everyone to explore Terrain Theory (TT) which explains why this has nothing to do with a 'virus', but is a direct intentional poisoning of humanity with a variety of toxins, including the so-called spike protein which is a bioweapon in itself. A good place to start for TT is Dr. Samantha Bailey's website:
https://drsambailey.com/resources/videos/germ-theory/germ-theory-vs-terrain-theory/
Her husband Mark Bailey just published this extensive review of virology.
https://drsambailey.com/a-farewell-to-virology-expert-edition/
Humanity has been intentionally poisoned on a global level ('virus' is the Latin word for poison). This whole charade has nothing to do with a virus or a vaccine, or public health. The virus idea was a subterfuge crafted on FEAR to get people to accept being jabbed with poisonous bioweapons. There is not a single extended family on this planet that won't be touched by this evil tragedy. People have started dropping dead in the streets or in their sleep ('SADS'), or having 'vaxxidents' in their cars, or dropping everywhere with Grand Mal seizures. This is only the beginning.
https://usawatchdog.com/cv19-virus-vax-about-control-not-health-dr-michael-yeadon/
https://usawatchdog.com/cv19-vax-deadliest-fraud-in-history-edward-dowd/
The Medical profession itself has also started dropping with illness and death, since about 94,000 docs were mandated to get jabs last year. Even worse with our precious nurses.
https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/doctors-in-canada-are-dying-at-a
As you say, we are royally effed!
Marc Mullie MD FRCSC
Ophthalmologist
Montreal
update:
https://lionessofjudah.substack.com/p/update-on-canadian-doctors-dying?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email
You asked:
Were these previous donors vaccinated or not?
The article though mentions the following:
Graft rejection occurred anywhere from one day to six weeks after vaccination in all patients–some who underwent the procedure as far back as twenty years ago.
So if the graft happened 20 years ago, the donor in that case could not have been vaccinated with the covid-19 injections. How many of these donors were vaccinated with covid-19 is likely to be very low if not zero based on that statement though since that's the only statement, it's possible it's higher.
I wanted to put your comment under my updated post. You stated:
"It's just one piece of a very large puzzle.
Vaccinated organs in Vaccinated Recipients.
Vaccinated organs in unvaccinated recipients.
Unvaccinated organs in Vaccinated Recipients.
Most of what I've read is that the Vaccinated Recipients are having a much higher rate of rejection with organs...but nothing I've read specifies where the organs have come from and so far nothing available (that I've found), on unvaccinated receiving vaccinated organs."
Except this study did say that the procedure occurred as far back as 20 years ago so those donors were not vaccinated against covid-19 but could have been vaccinated against other things. The rejection occurred between 1-6 weeks after the covid-19 vaccine which suggests that in that case, it was unvaccinated organs in vaccinated recipients. Given that they state as far back as 20 years, it seems likely that most if not all of these cases fall under the same bucket but it's possible that there was only 1 or a few outliers where the rest had a very recent transplant in which case the rest could be in the vaccinated organ/vaccinated recipient bucket.
This article doesn't seem to look into the vaccinated organ in unvaccinated. We can't rule this out for the futur but this study didn't seem to look at this bucket.
I received a kidney 5 weeks ago today. I am unvaxxed. I have no idea whether the donor was vaxxed or not. I am proceeding as if he or she was by relying on the FLCCC protocol. I have no idea what else to do. I will be going back on intermittent fasting just as I did prior to surgery. I specifically requested that I receive an unvaxxed kidney but was told that the team could not promise such a thing because they were not willing to ask the family about their loved one' vaccination status. This is a little hard to believe since the practice in the province is to keep data on everyone who enters the hospital. One can state that the are or are not vaxxed or they can decline to answer. Finally, I refused receiving blood in the event it was needed. The likelihood of needing blood was low to begin with.
Where did you have the transplant done? I thought unvaxxed were being excluded from receiving organ donation. Hope your recovery goes well.
I would rather not state where at this time. Approval didn't come easily. I spent several hours defending my position. A Canadian can seek transplantation from any team in Canada. There aren't that many so it would not be difficult to find an unvaxxed "friendly" team willing to work with the unvaxxed. The fact that I am in good physical shape, I suspect, helped me.
Organ transplants also!
Sperm donations also!
Blood donations myst identify vax status!!!
You have to hook up with Tim Goyetche.He is a naturopath who can tell you so much about the immune reactions. You both are doing parellel studies. Thank you for researching this.
I clearly remember a terrible story Rebel News covered of a woman with double corneal implants who began to suffer rejection in both eyes after 20 years with no issues. She was forced to get the vax by her employer and even worse, after telling them about her problem, they still insisted she get the second. I often think of her and wonder how her story turned out, never saw a follow-up.