There are a lot of rumors circulating around the Russia and Ukraine war and its timing. A lot of theories about WEF and Vaccine passports being about the induction of Digital IDs and Social Credit Scores. Some worries about the internet being the next target to end open conversation and communication…And after what we’ve seen take place over the last 2 years it’s not hard to believe at least some of these things. There were a lot of Conspiracy Theories that came true and about the only one that hasn’t, was the widest conspiracy theory that Vaccines would End the Pandemic.
As more information and studies around the vaccines come out on their lack of effectiveness against COVID in addition to the Adverse Events that these have caused, up to and including the massive Pfizer document dump, only those not paying attention or willingly ignoring this information still believe that the vaccines actually work.
Thing is, it doesn’t matter if they do or don’t, infringements on our Rights and Freedoms is illegal and can only happen in extreme situations where the benefits must outweigh the risks and that they actually need to demonstrably prove that these are necessary.
I’ve talked about the Oakes Test before and have provided links but you can feel free to get caught up if you haven’t read what the Oakes Test is →Here, and if you are wondering if it applies to Federal Mandates the biggest thing to keep in mind is that this is a Test on Any Limitations of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, as in, ALL 3 Branches of Government must pass the test.
Is it possible that our elected officials aren’t aware of this?
While possible, at this point in the game this would only amount to gross negligence or willing ignorance and neither of these are lawful positions to be taking.
Ever try the, “Honestly Officer, I didn’t realize it was a 60km zone” conversation after being pulled over after being in excess of this? Does this work?
Probably a lot less than you’d imagine.
So, why do our elected officials get to do this?
Short Answer is They Don’t. Actual Answer is, because we’re letting them. And I kind of think that it’s time to put end to this.
After Hammering my MP with emails Len Webber decided to return the favor and signed me up for his “Community Newsletter”. In his email, was the results of his Monthly Poll Question and an opportunity to Vote Now on how necessary it was to use the Emergencies Act to end the protests in Ottawa:
I understand that there are a lot of issues that politicians want us to weigh in on for direction. They are supposed to be our Community Representation…so, it’s kind of their job. What I find troubling in all of this is that the question on ending lockdowns isn’t about “The Science”, the use of the Oakes Test, nor the Charter of rights and Freedoms, it’s a poll asking the community if they believe that the Lockdowns should End after 2 years of feeding the general public really terrible information and scaring the living hell out of them!
The Official Opposition Leader poses the following Question:
Why are we asking the community and the Liberal Minority Government about their plans or ideas on removing Federal Mandates instead of a Constitutional Challenge of the Federal Mandates that Do Not meet with the standards required?
Primacy of Constitution of Canada
52. (1) The Constitution of Canada is the supreme law of Canada, and any law that is inconsistent with the provisions of the Constitution is, to the extent of the inconsistency, of no force or effect.
After 6 months of the Travel Restrictions, not one of them have taken this step. All we see is worthless and ineffective politicking to the point where we do have to wonder if any of these people actually Want to see an end to this…because I am not convinced that they do.
So…with your help, I’d like to see who actually does Want to see these end. Let’s give them a poll and then we will know who we need to follow up with and if need be, remind them of The Constitution of Canada, the Charter of Rights and Freedoms and The Oakes Test, until they understand!
Please keep me included because I want to be able to produce Polling Results for them.
Header: Constitutional Challenge of the Federal Travel Mandates
Body:
Dear [Insert MP/MLA Name],
The Federal Mandates on restricting travel around vaccinations infringe on our Charter of Rights and Freedoms and in doing so, do not pass the requirements of the Oakes Test - Supreme Court of Canada - 1986, in that they are not:
Pressing and Substantial;
Rationally connected to any purpose;
Are not a Minimum impairment; Nor do they provide a
Proportional Effect.
Do you support a Constitutional Challenge on the Federal Travel Restrictions?
That’s it. That’s the whole email.
Simple. To the Point. And should make for an easy, non-political jargon response!
To include me on this email chain, BCC so that I can see who it went out to, with the caveat that you will need to forward me any response or CC so that they will hopefully recognize that this is one of those times that it’s appropriate to use the ‘Reply All’ option and save you from having to forward a response.
If they want to see the popularity of their decisions, I will help them in this but I need your help to begin. This does need to reach all provinces, all MPs and all MLAs, so please share this with your immediate circles, friends, family, community. If nothing else, it may lend to their understanding.
Let’s put an end to their chatter and see where things can go when the Rubber Meets the Road!
This is VERY timely as I was having this exact discussion with some friends just this morning. I'm going to forward your post to them. Thanks!
Thanks, good and timely idea. Will share and email MP's/MLA's