Following the Federal Court ruling that the use of the Emergency Act and seizing bank accounts was unconstitutional…
Following 2 years since the Freedom Convoy began…
Following 27 Months since the Mandates were put in place…
There is still No Science that has been presented to say or show how unvaccinated people were ever proven to be a risk to the vaccinated. Above this, there is still No Science that shows where people who weren’t suffering from multiples of comorbidities and obesity were ever at risk from COVID.
Was the use of the Emergencies Act unconstitutional?
Abso-freaking-lutely!
But given that there is no supporting information for people even needing to get the jabs or how they posed a threat to others who did…the Mandates themselves were completely unconstitutional.
Infringement on liberties afforded by the Charter of Rights and Freedoms must pass the Oakes Test:
A limit on a Charter right must be “reasonable” and “demonstrably justified.”
Is the legislative goal pressing and substantial? i.e., is the objective sufficiently important to justify limiting a Charter right?
Is there proportionality between the objective and the means used to achieve it?
The second branch of the test has three elements:
"Rational Connection": the limit must be rationally connected to the objective. There must be a causal link between the impugned measure and the pressing and substantial objective;
"Minimal Impairment": the limit must impair the right or freedom no more than is reasonably necessary to accomplish the objective. The government will be required to show that there are no less rights-impairing means of achieving the objective “in a real and substantial manner” (Carter v. Canada (Attorney General), [2015] 1 S.C.R. 331, at paragraph 102; citing Hutterian Brethren, [2009] 2 S.C.R. 567, at paragraph 55);
"Final Balancing": there must be proportionality between the deleterious and salutary effects of the law (Carter, supra, at paragraph 122; JTI-Macdonald, supra, at paragraph 45).
If there was never any science that can show imminent danger from COVID-19 to the general population, and there is no science that can show how being unvaccinated puts others in imminent danger, there is no Causal Link…the impairments were not minimal, nor were they proportional, reasonable and most certainly not - demonstrably justified.
Now, I’ve talked about this since the Ingram case in Alberta, when it was first brought up by Lieutenant-Colonel, David Redman (Former Head of Emergency Management Alberta) - where this was discussed regarding locking down Non-Essential Businesses, but the same people who completely disregarded the infringement of charter freedoms, continued to do so well past April 2021 and throughout the Travel Restrictions for Unvaccinated which lasted 11 full months.
11 Months of a 2 tiered society in the 21st Century, that cannot be justified by any actual means.
Extend this into the fact that the Government of Canada still can’t identify what a COVID Death actually is.
Don’t believe me?
Check it out → Here
Deceased case
A probable or confirmed COVID-19 case whose death resulted from a clinically compatible illness, unless there is a clear alternative cause of death identified (e.g., trauma, poisoning, drug overdose).
A Medical Officer of Health, relevant public health authority, coroner or medical examiner may use their discretion when determining if a death was due to COVID-19, and their judgement will supersede the above-mentioned criteria.
A death due to COVID-19 may be attributed when COVID-19 is the cause of death or is a contributing factor.
This is a whole lot of…we’ll tell you who died from COVID, even if we cannot define what a COVID death is.
Pretty shocking in that this was updated as recently as June 6th, 2023.
And given that - Link:
During the first wave of the pandemic and up to the end of May, long-term care facilities and retirement homes accounted for more than 80% of all COVID-19 deaths in the country.
Where these were the conditional high risks were associated with the following comorbidities:
Which, as it turns out…
As a point of comparison, the most common influenza comorbidities recorded between 2016 and 2018 were similar to those recorded for COVID-19 during the first wave.
Did we define non-essential businesses that needed to be closed between 2016 and 2018?
Were Influenza Vaccines Mandated?
Were Travel Restrictions Implemented?
NO!
But for 3 more full years after the first yearly assessment of COVID Mortality, people have been lead to believe that a case of the sniffles poses them an existential threat.
As of January 13, 2024…this same 80% is still represented as the Majority of COVID associated mortality, by way of Age as when the above report was published:
Where the absolute highest mortality rate, 80+ of almost 60% of the total COVID associated deaths only make up:
14% of the total ICU Admissions.
To understand why this is important…it’s because those 80+ years old…were either already in Hospice Care, because of their end of life health conditions…or had Goals of Care that EXCLEDUDED them from being admitted into Intensive Care.
Why this is important…goes beyond what was constitutionally supported and what is gross negligence that lead to death.
While the current Federal Ruling that using the War Measures Act, treating Canadians opposed to unscientific measures as terrorists, is a victory…there is still a lot more of this iceberg below the waterline that need be exposed.
If travel restrictions and mandates were implemented because, “We trust the science”, as they all screeched.
What science and where is it?
"There is still No Science that has been presented to say or show how unvaccinated people were ever proven to be a risk to the vaccinated." - Sure there is. The vaccine doesn't work. That's the only way. Glad I could clear that up for you LOL.
I'm always amazed at my species ability to rationalize and justify complete BS. During the fall 2021 election our fearless leader said this nonsense in Calgary and nobody call BS on it. They cheered.
Justin Trudeau: "If you don't want to get vaccinated, that’s your choice, but don’t think you can get on a train or plane beside vaccinated people and put them at risk"
Me: "Uh, you just admitted your vaccines don't work"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kSBk0AxUM64
And yet the people behind it never paid for their actions (actually got richer off the backs of the general population) and will never be punished.