Vaccines Have Doubled COVID Death Rates in Low Risk Groups
Is this why they are hiding the data?
At the end of March, Alberta Health Services and the Province of Alberta decided that they’d move to Weekly updates instead of Daily Reports from Mon-Friday. In this, they also decided that there was a lot of information that they were simply no longer going to report and a lot of it was the most damning information about how ineffective the Vaccines have been against COVID, most specific to Omicron. To get a sense of what all has been removed, you can have a look at the substack that I’d published on the data removal:
Over the last week, my substack posts have been sparse as I’ve been spending my days watching the Civil Suit against the Province of Alberta where Deena Hinshaw was testifying all week. While still in the process of compiling all of the information and combing over the data, I came across the information that is still available on the Provincial COVID dashboard and why it’s actually quite troubling.
Since the start of the pandemic and before the first death in the province, we’ve always known that there were low and high-risk groups. These High Risk Groups were identified by people with multiple chronic conditions as well as those over the age of 65, with 80+ being the hardest hit, where low risk had now conditions and were below the age of 65.
Alberta used to have a simple graphic on their page to show what this looked like and throughout the pandemic has been fairly consistent, by way of Pre-Existing Conditions:
The message here has always been that those with none of the pre-existing conditions, listed on the provincial site, were at the absolute lowest risk making up less than 5% historically and generally around 4% of the Total COVID mortalities in 2021. When last reported by actual breakdown, March 17th, 2022 the number was 4.1%.
164 of the total 4023 Provincial Deaths = 4.1%.
Throughout the last year, we’ve been delivered one solid message, “Vaccines are the best way to protect you and your family from COVID”, where a lot of the general public believed that that risk from morbidity and mortality was equal across the board. It never has been. In fact, the people highest at risk are in fact the exact same group who are at the highest risk from all cause mortality.
The province had started to break out these factors in Hospitalizations, ICU admissions and Deaths associated with COVID by both number of vaccinations as well as the “with condition” and “no condition”, further showing that those with pre-existing conditions are still at high risk, no matter if they’ve been vaccinated or not.
At current a snapshot of the COVID-19 Deaths over the last 120 days look like this:
Where you can see that as of the most current reporting, those with pre-existing condition are still the Highest Risk of Death from COVID and while we were told that Boosters were needed to keep you protected, this group makes up the Absolute Highest Risk of Mortality.
Lessening severity - which we were told the vaccines would do, doesn’t actually seem to be working out so well if the more injections you get, the more likely you are to DIE from the disease the vaccines were intended to protect you from. Even those trying to make this case right now are going to have a really tough time trying to rationalize this into the mix.
While this may be troubling…there is a lot more to the story and perhaps the reason that Alberta doesn’t want to feature some of the data anymore. Let’s have a closer look at the Current Deaths over the last 120 days.
One of the things to note is the *Table does not include with 1 dose, meaning that the actual total in all of those who have been identified by conditions and doses is actually 807 and not 835 as reported. Because the information on if the One Dose group has or doesn’t have conditions, I am not including this data in the breakdown.
What that will leave us with is that those with “No Conditions” make up a total of 66 of the 807 deaths in the last 120 days or 8.2% of the total deaths.
Stated Again, 8.2% of the COVID deaths are in people with “No Conditions”, over the last 120 days.
Scroll back up to the March 17th update and what is the percentage of COVID deaths, since the Start of the Pandemic in those with “No Conditions”.
4.1%
Over the last 120 days, that number has DOUBLED to 8.2%.
A special note about this is that 45% of the deaths in the “No-Condition” group came from fully vaccinated or boosted groups, 30/66, where there were 36 in the Unvaccinated Group.
To wrap this in a little perspective for you, I’ve dug up the numbers from the same day, 1 year prior - March 17th, 2021.
After the first full year of COVID in Alberta (first COVID death being reported in Alberta on March 19,2020), there were a total of 57 Deaths in the group that had “No Conditions”, making up only 2.9% of the total deaths. By March 17, 2021, only 8% of the population was Fully Vaccinated.
Following a year of excessive lockdowns, vaccine passports, a lot more vaccinations and 2 weaker variants of COVID, this number went from 57 to 164, showing an almost 100% increase on these deaths, almost double that of the year prior, in Year 2 of the pandemic and also seeing that we went from 2.9% death rate in this group to 8.2% over the last 120 days. By March 17, 2022, 80% of the population was Fully Vaccinated, 36% of them boosted.
Also worth noting, for the sake of comparison, that over this last 120 days, there were 66 Deaths in this group when in the Entire First Year of COVID, there were only 57, while Omicron has been the Predominant Strain of COVID for 110/120 of those days.
Total deaths up to March 17, 2021 - 1957.
Total deaths from March 18, 2021 - March 17, 2020 - 2066.
You see, there was no reduction in deaths by way of effect from the vaccines in the second year because following vaccinations there were 109 MORE COVID deaths more for 2021 than 2020, it is that the most dramatic uptick was the almost 200% growth in deaths in those who have “No Conditions”.
When the least vulnerable members of any society are dying at 2x the rate during any calendar period, this should be cause for alarm. When this is specific to only COVID and with the only new factor introduced was the Vaccines - we shouldn’t be removing the data…we should be looking at a lot more of it and a lot closer!
It will never happen but if we could ever get people to study commentary like yours and others for two weeks and then study what the government tells them we would flip this thing on its head. People would be furious beyond belief but they just don’t make the effort the way that some of us do
"When this is specific to only COVID and with the only new factor introduced was the Vaccines - we shouldn’t be removing the data…we should be looking at a lot more of it and a lot closer!"
This behavior of not looking is consistent with AHS behavior over the past 2 years. In past stacks you talked about how AHS never studied whether any of the measures that they took were effective.
This is either criminal or incompetence.