It's A Lot More Infuriating Than You Could Have Even Imagined.

"Trust the Science"

While I was going through the information from Alberta for my previous substack:

Choosing a Second Vaccine Booster...

I tripped across the Vaccine Effectiveness Tab that is now on the Alberta Provincial COVID Dashboard and figured I’d loop back to it once I finished covering how big of a moron Dr. Deena Hinshaw is…but got bored and poked into it this evening anyways.

You won’t even believe this, but like always, I will provide all of the links so you can verify everything that is current with this.

It starts on the Vaccine Effectiveness tab, which shows this:

As of the most recent report - last week, July 25th, 2022 under the Vaccine Effectiveness tab that “A large body of evidence suggests that vaccines are safe and effective against COVID-19”.

What is kind of troubling is that the information used to look like this when posted:

Where its fairly definitive on the Vaccine Effectiveness percentages and defines Vaccine Effectiveness as “Protection against infection”, where as now…VE is defined as:

A comparison between vaccinated and unvaccinated.

They’ve changed the definition to instead of meaning that something works to that its now a comparison…

Comparing the vaxxed to the unvaxxed to see if they are at risk, no longer about stopping infection…because we know that it does not do this. So, why would they just all of a sudden play a word game on this?

I’ll fucking tell ya!

Under ‘The Evidence’, you will find a link to an ‘evidence review’ published by McMaster University on June 22, 2022.

Admittedly, I only started scanning this document so I am only going over this high level for the time being, but in that ‘evidence review’, if you scroll down to page 5/110, you will see this:

That the studies they compiled would be shown with their analytics but with a certainty level attached where:

Green = Low risk of bias;

Yellow = Medium risk of bias;

Orange = Complete and utter, biased and inconsistent, BULLSHIT!

And as you go through the study, you will find that almost none of these made it up to a moderate risk of bias - yellow, but that ZERO of them made it to being remotely credible and almost 95% of them were complete and utter bullshit.

And then notice, when they couldn’t even find any cherry picked bullshit data to support their claims, they just left those boxes empty - Page 9/110.

2 doses of vaccines had No Data published to show Mixed Vaccine Dosing stopping infection, none of the vaccines showing any metric for effectiveness under Symptomatic Infection and move down to transmission and you will find the exact same - for Omicron.

NO DATA!

And even for the 2 doses up to 30 days, lowest effective rate was 11% and the highest was 48% - less than coin toss odds.

The best data that they could find to support having the vaccines is 90% blank, 10% bullshit and they had to Cherry-Pick to show it!

Now…this is troubling to be sure…but scroll back up to page 6/110 and you will see this:

That Vaccine Effectiveness was an abysmal failure of the vaccines with Omicron in prevention of Symptomatic Infection, Severe Disease and look at the bottom row, death.

Some of these numbers look like they might make sense but the problem with this is that there are several vaccines listed, with effective rates, but there is only Pfizer Data on Effectiveness on Death?

And even that had to be cherry-picked bullshit?

For up to 90 days only?

Where as they have No Data on Moderna, Astra Zenecca, J&J or Mixed Vaccines on the reduction of death as in, there is absolutely no reason to take them.

Again…I just started piling into this, sure I’ll find more when I loop back…but, if you want to both laugh hysterically and and be 10/10 furious inside of the same 12 seconds…check out the links above and let me know what you’re seeing.

This is what they are displaying on the Provincial Website…supporting More Vaccines!

---