For the last few years, Canada has been plunged into a Polar Vortex…which, for thousands of years, by sane people, has been referred to as WINTER.
But has it really gotten so cold that Hell has Frozen Over and CBC is actually reporting vaccine injuries?
Holy Smokes!
Get your popcorn, kiddies…this could be interesting.
You can find the full link to the story here→ Link, but I’m going to break it down for you anyways…
Yup…there it is.
The story opens with this nugget:
More than 1,000 New Brunswickers have had an adverse reaction after getting a COVID-19 vaccine, and more than a quarter of them were considered "serious," according to the Department of Health.
Which…if you had no idea about how many people are in New Brunswick, the population is about 812K.
And in this, 86.7% of them have had at least one jab:
Making up around 704K of them.
Meaning that your chances of being injured by the vaccine were about 1 in 704.
Which is actually shocking.
Since more than 300 of them were Seriously Adverse. By the story:
An event is considered serious if it:
Results in death.
Is life-threatening, such as anaphylaxis, a severe allergic reaction.
Requires in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization.
Results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity.
Results in a congenital anomaly/birth defect.
Which…nobody will disagree…these are in fact very serious…
What I am not seeing on that list, however…is Heart Damage - Myocarditis, Blood Clots and Strokes…maybe those are lumped into other categories?
But here’s the thing…with 300 people injured in 704K population, your chances of being ‘SERIOUSLY INJURED or DEAD, are 1:2347 or a Serious Injury rate of .042% for the total population.
Because I’ve been drilling into Case Fatality Rates and Already had the Stats open…I figured I’d drill this out for comparison…
And the CFR from COVID in New Brunswick is .87, 85,845 COVID Cases resulting in 744 Deaths.
Now…I do question their data because it seems a little suspect in some of their weekly reports, noting that these ALSO took place following bivalent Vaccines. Showing the Mid-August reporting of the last 2 months, you can appreciate my skepticism.
If in October then went from averaging around 4 deaths per week and it hopped to 83 for the following week, or from an average of 6 deaths per week to 94…major alarm bells would have been going off…but they weren’t…which means this is probably bullshit.
Moving right along…
A .87% CFR means that 1 in 111(ish) cases of COVID resulted in Death.
So…it seems like you are still better taking jabs than are to get COVID, right?
Welp…not really.
Here’s the thing…Health Canada Statistics show the following:
91.2% of COVID Mortality is in those aged above 60 and 72.5% of Vaccine Injuries were in those aged 0-59.
So…of those 744 Deaths…679 were likely over the age of 60…meaning 65 deaths occurred under the age of 60.
Of the 1000 injuries, 725 would be under the age of 60 as would 218 of the 300 Serious Injuries.
Read that all again…in the last 3 years of COVID, around 65 people, under the age of 60, Died from COVID. Over the last 2 years of Vaccinations, 725 of them were injured, 218 of them seriously injured, and some of them actually may have DIED from the vaccine.
As in, you were 11x More Likely to have a Vaccine Injury and 3x More Likely to have a Serious Injury, in the Province of Manitoba if you were under 60, than you were to die from COVID.
Now…I want to state some obvious things here:
If the side effect from a Vaccine is DEATH, it is not SAFE.
If you are 11x more likely to be injured by the vaccine and 3x more likely to have had a Serious Injury, it is NOT A GOOD IDEA!
There is a lot more that can be drilled out in this…but it wasn’t done by CBC…in fact they pretty much closed with Department of Health Spokesperson saying…
"So far, these safety concerns have not been raised through other vaccine safety monitoring systems in the United States, or in other countries — including Canada,"
&
“If New Brunswick Public Health's recommendations regarding the safety or suitability of this vaccine were to change, that information would be communicated to the public.”
Which of course, also included…
"Evidence indicates that the benefits of COVID-19 vaccines continue to outweigh the risks of the disease," the federal website states.
That Health Canada still says that the benefits of the vaccines continue to outweigh the risks of the disease.
I’m not a doctor…never claimed to be one…but after having a gander at this report, I’m just not convinced that these people are telling the entire truth about this.
Oh…wait…
"Limited hangout" is intelligence jargon for a form of propaganda in which a selected portion of a scandal, criminal act, sensitive or classified information, etc. is revealed or leaked, without telling the whole story. The intention may be to establish credibility as a critic of something or somebody by engaging in criticism of them while in fact covering up for them by omitting many details
When will The Prime Poisoner be held to account?