Hamster Boy - Part 3 - Concluded and Summarized
This is why we may see COVID lock-downs and Vaccine Passports until 2025
Having gone over some of the data that is available to health care professionals, virologists and epidemiologists in my previous post, I’m going to finish off the Expert Testimony given by Dr. Jason Kindrachuk, Assistant Professor and Not an actual Virologist on February 23, 2022.
One of the things that Kindrachuk went over is that containing or controlling the virus is the most crucial part of a pandemic. What this essentially means is that his thought pattern is still akin to “Flattening the Curve”, after a full 2 years of failing to do this very thing.
Anybody with the most basic of understanding and the ability to see can probably appreciate that this idea of controlling COVID is not possible…but the problem with this is, while Jason does believe that Actual Data is important, Modelling Data is less time consuming then real world data and that real world data is a retrospect rather than offering ability to forecast. If we can forecast what we may be seeing, we will be better prepared to deal with it and implement measures to reduce the amount of spread and impacts on morbidity.
“If we don’t talk about Morbidity, we are missing the point”.
His statements only actually have to be true up to the beginning of July because everything after this point is retrospective, given that the grievances in this case are around NPIs up to this point in time and everything after this point are not even open for discussion. Now…during later cases, absolutely…but for now, truth is actually based on a limited scope of time.
If testimony was allowed past this and attorney would simply ask the question, “Did the NPIs actually work to stop the spread?”, and unfortunately, because of '“Modelling Data” being used, the answer would still come back the same as a resounding “Yes”.
How?
You have to remember back to the early days of COVID when the forecasts for cases, hospitalizations and deaths from COVID were amazingly dramatic, like this:
The vertical bars at the bottom indicate the Actual and the curved bars were the Forecasts. Anything could have been imposed during this time frame and as long as we never actually hit the Modelling Forecasts, they could be considered successful. March of 2020 is the official timeline for COVID hitting Alberta and in less than 2 months reality had separated itself from the modeling data and it wasn’t even close.
This was the 2 weeks to flatten the curve notion.
So they don’t actually have to be all that good at modeling, they just have to rationalize that measures taken prevented us from hitting these modeled numbers and Ta-Da, success!
You may want to believe that this isn’t what happened but if you track forward on it, you will see it’s true and worse yet, even with this detached from reality guidelines we still found ourselves in a place where Unvaccinated were being blamed for filling up hospital beds and ICU’s and were causing necessary treatments and surgeries to be cancelled because all of these beds were filled with unvaccinated people.
To me, this reads like an admission of failure on 2 critical points:
Their Modeling data on Cases, Hospitalizations and Deaths were bullshit.
The Modeling data based on Vaccinations were bullshit.
And while this is true, its more true in a world where the vaccines could have actually prevented transmission of COVID as well as truly lessened Severity…which they didn’t.
But, one other major point that Kindrachuk brought up is that because of the way that COVID can mutate, we will Never Reach Herd Immunity, or in his exact words:
“Likelihood of us reaching Herd Immunity is very very very low, infinitely small. How can we best control this virus is to know that it is likely to transmit on a yearly basis.”
Let’s put this all together.
Not an Actual Virologist or Epidemiologist but a guy who studies Hamsters and is an Assistant Professor at the University of Manitoba and Expert Witness for the Province of Alberta, thinks:
Your most important right that should not be infringed upon is, Your Right To Feel Safe;
He is unable to identify or differentiate Severely Vulnerable, Highly Vulnerable and Moderately Vulnerable, despite all real world evidence showing exactly who these people are:
Vaccines don’t cause adverse reactions despite Evidence from the Province and Federal Data saying that they specifically do.
Causation does not equal Correlation, showing an increase in COVID cases following Vaccinations, here:
But we can conclude that pandemic measures are working because causation does equal correlation:
Like Influenza and the common Cold, there will be no true Herd Immunity.
All which has been tested through a Flawed PCR test that has not been standardized by CT and cannot show the difference in Pre-Symptomatic, Asymptomatic and Non-Transmissible COVID; and
Because it’s easier to speculate than look at the data;
Why we will probably be locked down during every new Variant and again through different strains of existing variants, while requiring more vaccinations and use of masks…that haven’t worked since the beginning of COVID in the Province of Alberta, nor Across Canada. All of this information was gleaned by extensive studies from other peoples work and Hamsters.
And if you’re not sure that this is where we are headed and why, try and figure out why Canada just approved 2 new vaccines for the country and why despite not ending Federal Vaccine Passport Mandates, why the subject of conversation is on anything and everything except Federal Vaccine Passports and Mandates.
Thank you for your research & passion.
Well that’s scary.