Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Camilla's avatar

A ruling just came out this morning that (Seneca College's) university vaccine mandates are NOT unconstitutional. Guess what Peckford's lawyers are arguing in the travel mandate case? You got it, that the travel mandates are unconstitutional, so you can bet that case will be lost as well. To make matters worse, the lawyers for Seneca are already saying that as a result of this decision, employer mandates are also not unconstitutional. (Guess what we can expect this fall ?) Bottom line is unless and until we start arguing the scientifically proven damage caused by these 'vaccines', we will be subject to mandates forever or until we are all dead- whichever comes first. IMO we need a class of injured people who had blood drawn before and after, or who can otherwise prove the 'vaccine' caused their injury or death (tissue staining proving the absence of nucleocapsid but presence of spike protein) to file a massive suit against the Colleges of Medicine, CMA, PHAC etc for negligence, fraud etc. If we don't get loud, unified and organized and massively pissed, we will continue to get steamrolled by organized 'medicine', pharma and law- which are clearly acting in unison.

Expand full comment
Brian Beckett's avatar

Wow, as a pure blood, (i love this term for un-vaxxed) this puts an interesting spin on things.

I never thought of the fact that if i do end up needing blood, or an organ, that i would definitely voice my opinion on receiving clean (un-vaxxed) blood or organs.

That'd make doc's head explode wouldn't it?

I should also note:

I was an active blood donor, but once Co-vid came around, i quit, as i was not a conformist, i felt i would be declined or pressured by a medical professional if i showed up to donate.

Since then, I've decided selfishly to keep my clean blood to myself. Mostly a trust issue now.

Expand full comment
40 more comments...

No posts