End the Use of the Experimental Vaccine Studies in Canada for Pfizer and Moderna
Suspension or Cancellation of Experimental Studies Certificate
Make no mistake, Justin Trudeau is going to war with Canadians over the authorized use of an experimental vaccine that isn’t working and should have it’s Experimental Studies Certificate Cancelled.
You may think this is about passports or mandates because that’s where all of the attention seems to be going…but it’s really not.
Why?
Because the COVID Vaccines are Experimental Treatments/Drugs whose benefits cannot be substantiated. If the qualifications for their Experimental Studies Certificate cannot be met their use must be discontinued and the mandates and passports dissolve.
This is where the conversation ends.
Not with Trudeau. It’s not his call to make.
Let me lay it out for ya.
Health Canada has authorized the vaccines for use under Division 8 of the Food and Drugs Regulations. This approval came under the understanding that both Pfizer and Moderna were authorized as such:
Reviewing and authorizing vaccines
As for all vaccines and treatments that are authorized in Canada, we'll review the evidence and scientific data. We'll then decide whether to authorize the COVID-19 vaccine and will only do so when the evidence shows that the vaccine:
is safe, effective and of good quality and
demonstrates that the benefits outweigh the risks
These measures will help make safe and effective vaccines and treatments available faster in Canada.
Their authorized use in Canada is based on them being safe and effective, where the benefits outweigh the risks.
What are the benefits supposed to be?
Pfizer:
COMIRNATY is indicated for active immunization to prevent coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS- CoV-2) in individuals 12 years of age and older.
Based on these considerations, the benefit risk-profile of the Moderna COVID‑19 Vaccine is deemed favourable for active immunization against COVID‑19 caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) virus in individuals 18 years of age and older.
They were approved for “Immunization against COVID-19 caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome”.
Both of these are authorized for use under Canada’s Food and Drug Regulations, with Authorized terms and conditions.
The Authorized with terms and conditions are defined under Division 8:
Identifying that these are “New Drugs”, “Specific to COVID”, that they require an “Experimental Studies Classification” where by specific “Conditions of the Experimental studies must be met”, which of course all focus on the Authorization process where all vaccines in Canada are is safe, effective and of good quality and demonstrates that the benefits outweigh the risks.
&
Again, specific to COVID:
Vaccine is deemed favourable for active immunization against COVID‑19 caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) virus in individuals.
Oxford defines immunization as:
Where “immune” to infection means:
And the CDC:
There seems to be some really stupid conversations over what immunity actually means, reduction of cases or simply a reduction of severity of the disease but there shouldn’t be, because it’s only ever meant one thing and one thing alone. If you are immune to a disease, you can be exposed to it without becoming infected.
Never have this conversation again.
Now, with that being said, I am actually going to be showing that by either definition, cannot become infected and reduction of severity to show that the current vaccines do neither so that even if you do get sucked into this conversation, you have an answer.
The Government of Canada considers Canada to have had vaccines since December 14, 2020. We know this, because this is when they started their tracker on case count and severity by hospitalization and death →Link
This is when they started the clock on testing how safe and effective the vaccines were. Special note about the above, it says that this has been updated to January 30th, 2022 - not to current. Other important note, these figures are grossly misrepresented and I’ve explained it all here →Link
The point of this is the date. Health Canada wants you to know that there are less cases, hospitalizations and deaths in the fully vaccinated and fully vaccinated with an additional dose (boosted) and their flawed and inaccurate data seems to prove this.
All we have to actually do is have some comprehension of time and the above definitions to gain a full understanding.
As the number of people who are vaccinated goes up, the number of cases and deaths goes down. This is what “immunization” does, by way of either definition.
Are we seeing this?
From December 15th (14th not shown), 2020, this is what our cumulative vaccine count looked like:
Vaccines have absolutely went up.
However…So have cases:
And as for Deaths:
Our understanding, as stated above is, as the number of people who are vaccinated goes up, the number of cases and deaths goes down. What we are seeing is:
As the rate of our number of people vaccinated increases, our death rate has also increased, while our case count exploded.
Some, at this point will try to weigh in on Variants as in some are more transmissible than others and that Omicron was the most transmissible. So what?
Whether you believed that the vaccines were effective before, by either definition of immunization, they are not effective now!
But when did they start becoming ineffective?
At the end of June, 2021, we learned 2 very important things about the vaccines.
They do not stop transmission of COVID;
Reduced severity still included death.
Right here.
This is where there should have been more review on experimental vaccines that were intended to stop the spread and/or severity of the disease.
June, 2021!
&
We’ve come a long way over this last 14 months, but 61% of the mortality from COVID happened after Canada reports our start date of vaccinations.
This is where we are at the Effective portion of the “Safe and Effective” specifications for authorization of the COVID Vaccines.
Now we can move into the safety aspect of these.
In early days, prior to Canada having much by way of supply from the vaccinations, some of us had already heard that there were some pretty serious side effects from these vaccines, including death. Since then, I am sure we have all become more accustomed to what this looks like, the government of Canada has had Heart Damage specified, on the labels of vials that you never see, since the end of June.
It’s not on the consent form you signed before taking a vaccine. It’s on a label of a product you never get to see before getting getting injected with something that isn’t all that effective at doing anything positive, for your body.
Moving right along here…
I would personally never want to be in the position of having to make a decision over if a vaccine kills 100 people but saves a 1000, is it worth it?
It absolutely is. By A Lot. I just don’t want to be the person that has to rationalize what this looks like.
But what if we actually killed and injured people with the vaccines and didn’t really save anybody?
This is exactly where we are at. We’ve already seen that the more vaccinated people that there are, neither case rate nor death rate have declined. If there are any side effects from the vaccines, how would it make sense to continue their Experimental Studies Certificate, under the specification of being “Safe and Effective”?
Tragically, Canada has seen 35,769 COVID related deaths.
Unfortunately, the vaccines have created almost 3x as many adverse reactions, (95,442):
These adverse reactions happened in 36,857 people.
35,679 deaths over 2 years of pandemic.
36,857 people injured by vaccines over 1 year of wide spread availability to vaccines.
95,442 side effects from vaccines.
Per year, 2x as many people will be injured by vaccines than will die from COVID and they will suffer from 5x as many adverse reactions than these deaths.
Somewhere along the line, under Canada’s careful scrutiny of vaccines in their experimental stages should have been watching all of this and through the idea of their own prescribed risk benefit analysis.
A policy where the benefits outweigh the risks are being specified for experimental use of a vaccine during a Pandemic seems to pretty strongly imply that the benefits will outweigh the risks.
We are actually supposed to be measuring is the Safety and Effective Rate of the COVID vaccines in providing immunity and ending a pandemic. If they save more people than they injure, this needs to be weighed out.
The issue with this is, as we have increased the number of people vaccinated, we’ve also noted an increase in case count and mortality from COVID all while adding adverse events from the vaccinations to the overall mix.
Authorization by Division 8 specifies that the continuation of the experimental use of these current vaccines must be safe and effective. We have suspended the rights afforded through the Charter of Rights and Freedoms over a policy built around a product that is touted as safe and effective, that isn’t safe nor effective and shouldn’t be continued for use in Canada.
We don’t need to end the Mandates. We need to end the Vaccines by recognizing these facts…the mandates will dissolve.
Please share this information with your MLA and MP as they are seemingly lost in a conversation that doesn’t need to be had over a product that shouldn’t be used. We need to stop the use of the vaccines by their well-intended but completely-failed qualities by way of being neither safe nor effective. This isn’t a way to sidestep mandates by the liberal minority government; this is a request to enforce the guidelines and protections afforded to us by Food and Drug Regulations.
Excellent analysis, Sheldon. My husband leads a group of lawyers that compile evidence for cases. I have forwarded this to them.
sent to my MP and MPP