Did Health Canada approve Pfizer based on the same Pfizer Documents that Were Released Tuesday, March 1, 2022?
Pfizer Adverse Events - Deeper Dive Part 2
I’m sure you’re spitting mad and shouting obscenities at me through your monitors right now if you read through Part 1 of this and I get it. Problem with Data is you can really only work with what is available and it may not always lend itself to your way of thinking nor your recollection of the situation.
For a lot of us, it was never about the vaccinations…but more so about our own personal risks…but even at this and in case you missed it…extending the Adverse Events of Special Interest, it looked like we would reduce the Case Count of COVID-19 to significantly lower numbers, Canada Wide, based on either a 35% or 50% scale:
At 50% Pfizer Vaccinations for the population of Canada, if this information carried forward, we would have seen 300 Cases…and that’s buttons. This actually looks like a pretty good deal.
Sadly, this is where the Caveat should have come into play but was seemingly overlooked - Caveat being: Strict and Rigid monitoring of the usage outcome.
While I am sure that PHAC had access to a lot more information than what would be available on their website, as of April 30, 2021 - there were a total of 4,548 Adverse Events following Immunization reports.
From that, there were 13, 596 Adverse Events…
And 38 Deaths that occurred after the administration of a COVID Vaccine, 19 of which were under review:
All while we had 4 known vaccines in play and 1 unknown:
Could we attribute all of the Adverse Reactions to Pfizer, specifically - given that they had made up the greatest percentage of Adverse and Serious Adverse event reports?
Sure. But again, holding on to that same Caveat and all while watching countries discontinue their use of AstraZeneca’s vaccine due to “Rare” Blood Clots. In both Alberta and Ontario - less than 2 weeks following the Pfizer Report Date - Stopped Offering First Doses of AZ - May 11, 2021 →Link
CALGARY, Alberta, May 11 (Reuters) - The Canadian provinces of Alberta and Ontario said on Tuesday they would stop offering first doses of AstraZeneca's COVID-19 vaccine, with Ontario citing evidence that the risk of rare blood clots is somewhat higher than previously estimated.
Admittedly, Canada was REALLY SLOW to the punch on this one - given a look at Global Events, because Denmark, Norway and Iceland discontinued their use a full 2 months prior - March 11, 2021 →Link
There were a lot of moving pieces on the board here and a lot of things to weigh in balance and we are still comparing the lives of 19 people to reducing the Spread of COVID and potentially killing another 25k Canadians.
On Adverse Events - in the most common ones, the bulk of them were related to vaccine site injection tenderness and some nausea, fatigue and anaphylaxis - with the last 3 being the lowest AE Counts.
And past this, Canada had only realized that Myocarditis and Pericarditis were listed on the Adverse Events - albeit serious enough to issue a Public Advisory on the vaccines - on June 30, 2021 →Link
It’s somewhere between the April 2021 Pfizer report and June 30th, 2021 Advisory being implemented that some warning bells should have been going off. By June, we had 68% of the population with a single dose and had fully vaccinated 11 million people - 31% of the population of Canada - BUT, we also had the absolute lowest case count and deaths in almost a year as well:
The Vaccines are Working, they shouted, following with a “Safe and Effective” spirited message. That being said…there were somewhat of an explosion of Adverse Events.
And of these, largely inside of Age Groups who were never at any serious threat from COVID, those under the age of 60.
More was known about the risks of myocarditis including that symptoms started between 5 hours and 94 DAYS.
Deaths following administration of vaccines had already shattered what I’d consider the glass ceiling of 109 previously forecasted at 50% Pfizer Vaccination Rate and a lot of these were being brushed off for ??Reasons?? that I still don’t understand…
At this time…I would have to imagine that we’d have our top Vaccologists, Virologists and Epidemiologists sitting at the table looking at all of this and trying to assess the risks in relation to the benefit as well as the possibility that this may be another seasonal virus - No Flu Season in June in Canada - but did we?
And if we did, did they just reach conclusions based on Canadian Data and information that looks a lot sideways now…in hindsight?
Now…I am not trying to make up excuses for anybody here and of all of the critical people during this pandemic, I can still spout the numbers and reasons for my own personal choices in never being tested or even considering vaccines - still am not now - and I 100% believe that they should be pulled from the market along with a Passport system based on them…but again, lots of things to consider here and it’s the next leg of the journey, where shit went downhill fast and we’re still in a tailspin because of it.
Take some time and chew on what I’ve presented up to this point.
It may or may not be in tune with your own personal recollection of the events and the way they played out but this is the actual timeline of COVID, Vaccines and Adverse Events as they’ve played out, if we would have had the 5.3.6-postmarketing-experience report available to PHAC.
The big questions in all of this:
What did we know?
When did we know it?
And did we act accordingly?
Stay Tuned for Part 3…like tomorrow morning/mid-afternoon(ish).
At this point I am not sure but think that Canada is covering up vaccine side effects. If they are as low as they claim then why are our results so different from other countries. There is a tool for "How Bad is my Batch" that was put out by a brilliant person in Europe. His name fails me at the moment. There are suggestions that bad vaccine batches were more prevalent in red states in the United States. If there is a possibility of bad batches then it would make sense to me that possibility our apparently low adverse events could be a result of a careful distribution system for Canada. Trudeau is a relatively young WEF acolyte and could well prove to be useful for the Great Reset. It would make no sense for Canada to have an overwhelming adverse count and do too much obvious damage to the population. Particularly if you want to keep Trudeau viable.