With the Sovereignty act passed, yesterday morning at 1 am, of course Rachel lit her hair on fire and with Irish Whiskey pumping through her veins, stormed the Twitter.
I mean…exactly what the fuck are generational problems anyways?
Or is she referring to the Generational Debt that all Canadians that will be paying the bills for the reckless spending of the Federal Government she supports?
She does mention ‘Affordability’ and a ‘Resilient Economy’, with ‘Good-Paying Jobs’…which of course is what all Albertans do want…hell, all Canadians want the same thing..but when this comes down to what we all believe as helping out with affordability and good-paying jobs, is 100% NOT what the federal coalition party wants to see for Canadians and most certainly not for the Prairie Provinces.
Because while Conservatives - who represent most of the province were getting shit done on a provincial level…the feds, propped up by the NDP have other plans, where affordability and good-paying jobs are excuses to push further taxation and drive bullshit policies, specifically into the prairies. No wonder even Scott Moe - PM of Sask wants to raise his middle finger to the feds as well.
Check this shit out…
Vote # 236 - Bill C-235 - Private Members Bill - 3rd reading and adoption of Bill C-235, An Act respecting the building of a green economy in the Prairies
Building a Green Economy in the Prairies?
What does this even mean?
Content
(3) The framework must include measures that promote economic sustainability and growth and employment in the Prairie provinces by
(a) addressing the limited or non-existent transportation options in small cities and communities, and advancing innovative solutions for public transportation services in those cities and communities;
(b) fostering job creation and retraining in regions that rely on traditional energy industries to enable them to build a zero-emissions green economy and mitigate their impact on climate change;
(c) prioritizing projects that generate natural infrastructure and a clean environment, such as tree-planting initiatives, solar energy projects and environmental management of the boreal forest, and that make use of new sources of energy, including nuclear energy;
(d) integrating clean energy into fields such as agriculture, forestry, transportation, manufacturing and tourism;
(e) establishing programs and projects that stimulate a green economy, in a way that takes into account local circumstances, and the participation of local businesses, governments and civil society organizations; and
(f) preparing infrastructure projects that facilitate adaptation to climate change and mitigation of its adverse effects.
I’ve highlighted the important parts…Zero Emissions, Solar Energy Projects, Clean Energy in Agriculture, forestry, transportation manufacturing and tourism - Preparing infrastructure projects that facilitate adaptation to climate change and mitigation of its adverse effects.
Which is all claptrap that means stop using and developing fossil fuels in the prairies and start focusing on trees and solar energy…because…reasons?
The climate change we’re worried about in the Prairies is the Shifting of Seasons from Fall into Winter where some parts of the province dipped below -30 C, this week. Because having more trees, and more solar panels isn’t going to do fuck all.
People will Freeze and Die.
And why focus strictly on the Prairies Provinces?
Why not focus on the dumping of raw sewage into our rivers, lakes and oceans by Green BC and Quebec - who just received a sweetheart deal from the feds on Carbon Tax for the remainder of this program?
Punishment…that’s all it is.
All other provinces in Canada think that Alberta, Sask and MB need to green up…because they’ve stopped using fossil fuels?
Rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrright….
And how’d this vote even turn out?
176 Yeas to 137 Nays where in Alberta, we don’t actually want the feds telling us what to do…28 Nays to 4 Yeas in the Province…and you can already guess who voted those 4 votes came from, right?
The 2 NDP and 2 Liberal MPs that are in the province…voted for all other provinces to get to pick what we do with our land and natural resources.
And check this shit out…
Even Quebec sided with the Conservatives AGAINST the Coalition Government on this. As in, Quebec agreed to not force the Prairie Provinces into Green Bullshit where 4 MPs from Alberta thought that we need to listen to the Feds.
Does it sound like the Rachel Notley Party is really in this FOR Alberta?
No…it does not…
But wait…it gets worse.
Vote 238 - Opposition Motion (Carbon Tax)
That, given that,
(i) Canada's Food Price Report 2023 states that a typical farm will pay $150,000 in carbon tax per year when the carbon tax is tripled,
(ii) families will pay an additional $1,065 for groceries in 2023 for a total of $16,288 due to increased costs being passed on to consumers,
(iii) food bank visits were at an all-time high reaching 1.5 million in March 2022, a 15% increase from the previous year according to Food Banks Canada,
(iv) 20% of Canadians are skipping meals and grocery price inflation is at 11%,
the House call on the government to cancel the carbon tax that is applied to all food inputs and production, including:
(a) all farm fuels;
(b) grain drying;
(c) fertilizer;
(d) transportation; and
(e) other appropriate aspects of the food supply system.
Given that there is Massive Inflation caused by Liberal Mismanagement of Funds, BoC raising it rates again and groceries for families will cost an additional $1,065 in 2023, all-time highs were reached at the food bank where 20% of Canadians are skipping meals…some of us believe that a tax on food production and transportation that has done absolutely ZERO since it’s inception, should be cancelled…
How’d this vote go?
Voted against…of course, and as for those people who want to help tackle the affordability crisis in Alberta…they too don’t believe that extra taxes that accomplish ZERO, should be removed.
But all we hear about is the Climate Crisis…instead of the actual affordability crisis and food crisis…and the liberals just want to piss away more money buying votes.
Creating jobs that are funded by tax paying dollars and robbing Canadians at the pumps and for the cost of food productions are not ways of creating a stronger economy, effectively creating jobs or making life more affordable - the are the EXACT FUCKING OPPOSITE!
No thanks, Rach.
Now that we’ve got a Premier who actually represents the majority of the province instead of the Coalition Government…you’ll never see another premiership.
EVER.
And when we vote you out, in 6 months again…
I’ll be toasting your walk of shame and sipping out of this:
Canada's growth prospects for the long-term are grim. Quack job Justin Trudeau and that incompetent psycho Chrystia mortgaged the future. And this time, I don't we're going to see a 'Paul Martin balance the budget' scenario. I think this one is going to sink Canada.
Hope I'm wrong but if this guy stays in power for much longer, 'oublie ca' as we say here in Quebec.
It will take a long time to repair the damage done. From the carbon tax to MAIDS to the invocation of the EA, and the endless stream of scandals at his feet.
His father put Canada in a hole we managed to dig out of, but Justin is digging a much deeper hole.
Like father, like useless son.
Rachel is channeling evangelists with empty platitudes and lofty goals at which she failed miserably when she was in power. This is one of the many problems in Canada, these idiots make up garbage on the fly simply for the sake of opposing and tweeting. All talk, and any "solutions" are recycled garbage that already failed and in most cases is the cause of the current crisis. Tale of the tape:
1. "We need to come together to solve generational problems.". Here's a generational problem: the abandonment of Section 7 and Nuremberg, coercing at-one-time-EUA covid injections. Did Rachel work towards a 'come together' solution? No. Fascist Rachel went all in on mandates and passports. How about the generational problem of our kids being conditioned to saturate in sanitizer and wear very destructive masks, which I also believe is a violation of Section 7? [Q: What do the liver, kidney, intestine, and lungs have in common? A: They are organs that expel toxins. Masks interfere with the activity of the lungs and that directly compromises the security of the person]. Again, how did Rachel work towards a 'come together' solution? All in on fascism. Fail.
2. "Chaos in healthcare". I covered this a couple of days ago. How would she "put an end" to the "chaos"? It's chaotic because it's a bureaucratic cesspool of waste. Her ideas are to continue with the vaccine mandates and disallow qualified people from working, while doubling down on the bureaucracy. Another fail.
3. "Affordability crisis". Did Rachel ever balance a budget? Does Rachel even understand the Laffer Curve? Has she ever heard of it? No, no and no. Third fail.
4. "A real plan to build a resilient economy with good-paying jobs" - the problem, of course, is that the NDP view of "good paying jobs" means (a) government jobs, (b) union jobs, (c) government union jobs, (d) taxing the ever loving hell out of any and all private enterprise. Completely unsustainable and it is the current trajectory of the country right now. Fourth fail.
Notley is tired, spent, destructive and counterproductive.